Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
'man info'??
...
And after 10 years using Linux, I... well I still have not been able to figure out how to use info to get any info!
...
[sigh] If you don't know emacs, info becomes more arcane that it needs to be.
One advantage to info lies in the jump-to-keyword and drill-down-from-keyword features. Some of this is less (sic) valuable since we now have the 'less' pager with built-in search. The way that info works is more like what we do with a wiki today. I would like the docs as wiki files, and some way to augment with my own comments and notes and such. I would likely use 'lynx' or similar as the wiki reader.
I'm running Ubuntu Jaunty (v9.04) and I don't find a "complete set" of info files. In many cases, the info page and the man page have identical and limited content.
[sigh] If you don't know emacs, info becomes more arcane that it needs to be.
I agree, because I tried GNU Emacs and it just made my hands and brain hurt, and why does it need to be a whole "OS" when the one it's running on is great? Just another useless layer of abstraction.
I agree, because I tried GNU Emacs and it just made my hands and brain hurt, and why does it need to be a whole "OS" when the one it's running on is great? Just another useless layer of abstraction.
(grin) Remember, emacs hails from days without any sort of user GUI. Today, we can easily open multiple instances of an editor and spread things out on our desktop. Then, each process was expensive so the editor provided multiple windows, a shell, and all sorts of toys. As a developer, one could launch emacs and never leave it all day.
When X11 happened, emacs get "enhanced" to become Xemacs that took advantage of the new environment. (Please don't flame over my choice of "enhanced" vs. "forked" vs. something else.) The original emacs crowd made their own changes to that plain-emacs would notice if X11 was available. Anyway, here we are...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.