Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
when all u get on boot is just the Grub Command Line, it usually means that Grub can't find the menu.lst file.
menu.lst file would typically be in /boot/grub, and in Redhat 9 would probably be a sym link to /boot/grub/grub.conf
/etc/grub.conf is also a sym link to /boot/grub/grub.conf
My suspicions would be that Grub can't read your linux partition after rebooting from Win, but i can't really say why.
Perhaps you try removing the "unhide" commands. (is it hidden in the first place?)
Disclaimer: have not done sufficent reseach and taking a quick jab at this Q. Please ignore if irrelevant
I have just installed RH9 on a Compaq X1000 notebook. My partitions are organised the same way as your computer bubbles.
The crucial difference is that I have left the MBR for Windows XP alone, and made the /boot (second) partition active. Grub is installed as the bootloader here. New notebooks have no BIOS constraints as far as where the bootloader goes, so this is ok. However, I understand XP likes to be in first physical partition.
Grub boots (graphical mode), then Windows XP can be chain-loaded if selected, else RH9 is loaded. Hope this helps.
I think one easy way would be to use first RH CD again (boot from this CD)- you can do 'linux rescue'. Just go through the menus until you get oppurtunity to install GRUB on /boot partition. You shouldn't even need to edit the config file.
Linux 'fdisk' can be used to make the /boot partition active. Also you can make sure that the Windows NTFS partition is not hidden. It will not start properly if this is the case. Now GRUB should be the first bootloader to load.
Next, fix up the XP MBR, you can boot from Windows Recovery disk if you have one. From there you can select recovery mode and get to a command prompt mode, where you can do a 'fixmbr'. This should get you dual booting properly again.