Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've searched everywhere for a possible answer to my problem but haven't found anything.
If I open a file to read (ie. cat somefile.txt, or vi somefile.txt), then run "ls -u" from the prompt, the fact the file's been accessed isn't reflected in the return from the command.
I have no idea what the problem is. I've tried getting an updated 'reading' via the "ls -u" command on a variety of files but always the same. The access timestamp isn't being updated!!
In konqueror it's the same. I can access a file but the file details in konqueror don't show it.
If anyone might help me I'd be really grateful. I'm a bit of a beginner and suspect it may be something simple.
I run a mandrake 10.0 official box, bash version 2.05b.0(1)-release.
Thanks very much! I've changed the relevant entries in fstab to defaults and can now see access times. I'll just have to see whether the system is much slower for the change. Thanks again!
its not that noticeable, if you ran a database or whatnot, where you are almost constantly accessing the hard drive, then you might see the hit, esp if a lot of tasks are using the drive at once. Not very noticeable a close to modern desktop computer.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.