LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-25-2006, 11:31 AM   #16
stratogratte
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0

I have found a backup of the superblock of my HDD, and I get this with e2fsck:
Quote:
e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/sdb3
e2fsck 1.37 (21-Mar-2005)
/dev/sdb3 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Later, I get
Quote:
kernel: Disabling IRQ #11
And some errors like these appear:
Quote:
Error reading block 35127298 (Attempt to read block from filesystem resulted in short read) while doing inode scan. Ignore error?
What do you think about this?
 
Old 03-25-2006, 12:02 PM   #17
TigerOC
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Devon, UK
Distribution: Debian Etc/kernel 2.6.18-4K7
Posts: 2,380

Rep: Reputation: 49
You must run a repair with e2fsck. Its unclear what you are doing with the drive but what is clear is that the drive is not being unmounted cleanly and if you continue like this you will lose the data on it.
 
Old 03-25-2006, 12:17 PM   #18
stratogratte
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I haven't done anything else than what I said :/ As I said, I don't want to do anything dangerous to don't lose my data
So I should run this?
Quote:
e2fsck -p -b 32768 /dev/sdb3
How could IRQ 11 be disabled only in doing the "e2fsck -b 32768 /dev/sdb3" command?

Thanks for your help
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc3 Lordandmaker Linux - Hardware 15 06-05-2011 08:55 AM
ERROR AT MOUNTING USB :mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1, saiket Linux - Hardware 3 04-12-2008 12:07 AM
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/cdrom, Adil_uk Linux - Hardware 9 02-16-2005 05:50 PM
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock...(cdrom,dvd and floppy) SpItoS Mandriva 14 11-12-2004 02:27 PM
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1 pmoreira Linux - Hardware 5 02-26-2004 10:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration