LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-17-2017, 03:26 PM   #1
kudsu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: from LA
Distribution: Slackware and anything
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
mac addresses from Princeton


I don't have the list but I saw a list of mac addresses that were known by Princeton to block or modify or whatever routers know to be used in public places. Some of these goodies were known to defeat mac changer or block similiar devices and software. What do you make of this? How do you get ahold of the mac address of the device if you are only down stream if you don't have a upstream device?
 
Old 07-31-2017, 03:20 PM   #2
seu_aba
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 10
It's only possible by software translating.
This is assuming that the individual is using a virtual reality that completely coincides with an actual reality such that the virtual errors would match the actual errors because the physics and mathematics of both would be the same.
In order for this to be accomplished,
one must be willing to create a complex cognitive environment separate and yet "co-dependent" on the original thoughts and ideas,
so to say.
In the position of central point within Schrodinger's paradoxical cube,
This would be forward thinking with database references from the top levels.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-31-2017, 05:04 PM   #3
kudsu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: from LA
Distribution: Slackware and anything
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
You are not getting it you are not getting it. The list exists I've seen it. There is detail on the list what is happening to your connection and why somebody is research them all do you want me to post the list I think it's very interesting
 
Old 08-01-2017, 08:57 AM   #4
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 10,649
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934Reputation: 3934
I am not aware of any scheme or standard for the assignment of MAC addresses to TCP/IP devices. Although there could well be one.
 
Old 08-01-2017, 09:15 AM   #5
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 25,680

Rep: Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894Reputation: 5894
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
I am not aware of any scheme or standard for the assignment of MAC addresses to TCP/IP devices. Although there could well be one.
In a typical NIC the first 3 octets contain a unique identifier that is assigned to the manufacture. A MAC should be a unique number for devices on the same network.
 
Old 08-01-2017, 09:48 AM   #6
kudsu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: from LA
Distribution: Slackware and anything
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Cool It was more than that!

The mac addresses of all the devices, the manufacturer, the filter behavior, everything was given. You know how I posted go to a mcdonalds and have a little fun. Well this list showed they were having fun with you! Get it. I will find the list and post the link. You never know who is watching.
 
Old 08-03-2017, 11:07 AM   #7
seu_aba
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 10
That which happened,
happened at a McDonald's.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 01:01 PM   #8
seu_aba
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 10
Listen

Do not edit my posts for any reason whatsoever.
According to the Netherlands Hague protocol on International Law from the Netherlands Hague Commission on International Law:
You are tampering with evidence for a future court case against a lot of individuals.

I did not post nor did I correct my posts.
The post before this of
"That which happened has happened" is not from me.
Do not touch my posts.
I will have you put in prison for tampering with evidence.
I understand computer forensics and know that evidence may and can be recalled down to tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of layers.

AS I had other information sent,
I will have that information recalled
and will have the removal of the information used to put you into a prison or area of my choice.
It will be one you will not survive.


Do not cross me again.

Mother Nature and the Great Spirit would not edit my posts.

You do not have the legal right to edit my posts without written -
that is hand written permission from me.

I will not give you any permission.

Right now, this forum is in enough trouble with federal authorities for tampering with evidence.


Leave my posts alone.

What I posted was:

"What happened happened in a McDonald's"

Because the crime did happen in a McDonald's.


I also wrote,
"I have my bamboo stick,
My erva mate,
my bomba,
and I'm going walking."


These events happened the day of and the day after the event occurred.
I also did this the day I wrote those two posts.


I do not care if you are using a man-in-the-middle attack from the Wicomico library in salisbury , Maryland from the library on Division street.
I do not care if you are the Salisbury, Maryland police trying to cover your tracks of what you did evil.
I do not care if you are the fallen from higher heaven and you are here to stop me.


What you have done is done.

You did evil.
You rebelled against your own nature.


You children of the fallen also rebelled.


You people are guilty of horrible crimes everywhere in Creation.

You have caused harm.


It's time for you to pay.



You have pissed me off to no end.

For this, you are and will be cursed.

Your families and friends will suffer in the coming days and weeks for the stupidity you just pulled here on this forum.


My words will be listened to by Mother Nature and the Great Spirit.

The World and Supreme Courts will listen to my words.

You have further damned humanity with your insolence, arrogance, stupidity, pride, and conceit.


Don't you ever pull this stupid [removed] again for any reason,
do you understand?

Yes, you do.

Now,
shut up,
sit down,
and deal with what you have done.

The next time,
you will feel the curse physically.

Last edited by seu_aba; 08-07-2017 at 01:05 PM.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 01:05 PM   #9
rtmistler
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Distribution: MINT Debian, Angstrom, SUSE, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 9,883
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930Reputation: 4930
@seu_aba,

That whole post is very impolite. If you are personally angry with Jeremy, a moderator, or another LQ member, there are procedures to follow, such as the Report button in the thread. Of which I have used by the way here. Or use the Contact Us link to contact the site administrators. We are not about personal attacks here at LQ.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 01:06 PM   #10
seu_aba
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 10
Do not edit my posts for any reason ever again.
They are for a court case.
Understand that.
I would not have printed that if you people would have left my posts alone.

Leave them alone.

Do not touch them again.

You are tampering with evidence.
That is a crime in which you will receive three to five years automatically.


I am very serious.
I will press charges.

Last edited by seu_aba; 08-07-2017 at 01:09 PM.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 05:03 PM   #11
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,600

Rep: Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083
seu_aba, you seem to be forming a habit of making off-topic posts that contain obscenities. This needs to stop if you'd like to continue participating here at LQ.

--jeremy
 
Old 08-07-2017, 06:41 PM   #12
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,974

Rep: Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623
It could be possible that someone or some group or some automated program could create a database of suspected mac addresses. There is one very big problem with using mac addresses. They are not unique to the world. Nothing states that a company or person can't reuse mac addresses. Nothing stops a user from spoofing a mac address. The list based on mac would be almost useless in my opinion.
 
Old 08-10-2017, 06:44 PM   #13
seu_aba
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 10
The lists will be updated to show personal information from the computers identifying those with the crime committed.
 
Old 08-10-2017, 06:57 PM   #14
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,974

Rep: Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623Reputation: 3623
Per forum rules.

Please post technical replies in the technical forums.
 
  


Reply

Tags
mac address



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I use iptables to limit bandwidth to certain IP addresses and MAC addresses baronobeefdip Linux - Networking 2 01-07-2014 07:36 PM
Ethernet MAC Addresses database; MAC address-based processing cctualatin Linux - Newbie 1 04-14-2009 08:59 AM
Binding 2 NICs (MAC addresses) to 2 IP Addresses in same Subnet RedHat EL4.0 skhira Linux - Networking 13 02-24-2008 08:16 PM
Binding 2 NICs (MAC addresses) to 2 IP Addresses in same Subnet RedHat EL4.0 skhira Linux - Networking 1 02-09-2008 07:17 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration