LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-16-2004, 04:23 PM   #1
albean
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Distribution: fc2
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 15
LSB 2.0 - what is it?


Hi,

I'm trying to understand exactly what LSB is all about. I've read some of what is on http://linuxbase.org and I tried slogging through parts of the specs but I have a couple questions.


I think LSB 2.0 is supposed to be a set of standards for the various distros to follow so that any application (written according to the LSB spec) can run on any distro that follows the LSB spec.

1) Is that above statement correct? And am I missing anything else that is fundamental to the whole LSB thing?

2) Also, does the LSB address the fact that distros all seem to have their own different directory paths to various libraries?

Thanks guys,
Al
 
Old 09-17-2004, 07:56 AM   #2
mhearn
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Durham, England
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 1,565

Rep: Reputation: 47
That statement is correct.

Directory paths to different libraries really isn't a big problem, contrary to popular opinion. Constant breaking changes in core libraries are the biggest problem, compunded by a lack of a good decentralised packaging system
 
Old 09-17-2004, 12:58 PM   #3
albean
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Distribution: fc2
Posts: 113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks mhearn.

>Constant breaking changes in core libraries are the biggest problem,
But LSB 2.0 directly addresses this problem, right?

>compunded by a lack of a good decentralised packaging system
I don't see anything that address this, though, in the LSB specs....
 
Old 09-21-2004, 09:46 AM   #4
mhearn
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Durham, England
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 1,565

Rep: Reputation: 47
No, LSB just standardises existing practice. The only libraries in the LSB were already very stable and/or stagnant, so it doesn't solve anything.

For the second point see autopackage.org
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LSB 3.0 released - Slackware compliance? Yalla-One Slackware 1 09-21-2005 07:34 PM
Lsb??? rm6990 Linux - General 3 09-15-2004 03:38 AM
redhat-lsb package nightwalker1945 Red Hat 1 05-06-2004 09:43 PM
Debian & LSB compliance RyanA Linux - Distributions 3 12-20-2002 05:56 AM
LSB 5amYan Linux - Distributions 3 06-06-2002 03:49 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration