Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
well, first of all a 2.5 kernel would be unstable.. could be of testing purposes.. i wouldn't mess with 2.5 kernel unless your gonna help them debug it and fix, compile.. etc..
most likely in the next kernel release 2.6 or probably later on down the road, the tulip driver will still be supported.. i hope, alot of cards use it.. unless someone plans on rewriting a new one for the kernel.
it seems that a lot of people who are new to linux don't know about the importance of the version numbering... 2.0.x, 2.2.x, and 2.4.x (the evens) are the stable trees. 2.1.x, 2.3.x, and (obviously) 2.5.x are unstable development kernels which have experimental and very rapidly developing code and may or may not cause your computer to develop the digital equivalent of epilepsy, not to mention what might happen to your precious data. basically, if you need to ask about the relevance of this particular driver update, you shouldn't be using that kernel tree.
This just comes from some juggling as the tulip device driver switches from Donald Becker to Jeff Garzik. Garzik's note is probably meant to point devel people to compile the old tulip code separately so they can keep their machine online as he fiddles with the new tulip code. Honestly, Linux never drops support for much of anything, I mean MCA device support is still around.
Oh, and what Tricky and Isajera said makes sense, no need in playing with 2.5 kernels unless you hate your machine. Cool your heels, 2.4.17 is going to be out any day now.