Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
03-10-2002, 01:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 391
Rep:
|
Linux and Dual CPUs?
I'm working on getting a dual P2 266mhz server built to run Linux. How well is Linux optimized to run on a dual system? Do I need to do anything special for it? I've built a number of computers in my time, none of which were built to run Linux though. So I have a question, I already have a Linux server running. When I build this new box and add my current hard drive to it, will Linux recognize the drive as a bootable drive and cause no problems? Or will I need to take a second route? Thanks for help.
|
|
|
|
03-10-2002, 03:22 PM
|
#2
|
|
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704
Rep:
|
Just install SMP kernel, or if during the install you'd default to UP kernel, recompile the kernel with SMP enabled
|
|
|
|
03-11-2002, 05:18 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Cornwall, England.
Distribution: Debian + Ubuntu
Posts: 4,345
Rep:
|
Sort of hijacking this thread...
My brother has a dual Celeron 400's mobo, and he's running XP (God, no!). He's found that XP only starts to use the 2nd CPU when the 1st one is overloaded - such as ripping CDs and converting to MP3 at the same time, so for running games and stuff, it'll still run as a 400MHz machine. How does Linux use the 2nd CPU?
(I am thinking of buying it from him  )
|
|
|
|
03-11-2002, 04:22 PM
|
#4
|
|
Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,700
Rep:
|
The first processor acts as a task scheduler for the other. Apparently Solaris handles SMP natively the best out of the x86 *nixs, but that's just fluff I've heard from my CS geek friends. On the 1 Linux SMP box I've got running, the load on the first processor always stays relatively constant, while the second is kicking through the work to be done. Apparently you really get to see Linux's SMP capabilities when dealing with 4,6,8+ chips, but I don't have $5k+ for a new toy to find out if that's true.
Cheers,
Finegan
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|