LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2013, 12:50 PM   #16
corbintechboy
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 480
Blog Entries: 1

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 51

Quote:
Originally Posted by suicidaleggroll View Post
As for this, I have roughly 13 computers under my care, running a combined total of 95 hard drives 24/7. Most of these machines are between 3-6 years old. Out of the entire set, I typically lose one drive every 2 years. If anything I think drives have gotten more reliable over the years, not less.

If you really are having hard drives fail on you this often, I would take a closer look at your setup. I used to lose a drive a year on my personal computer until I started putting a case fan on the drive (just a case fan on the front of the case in front of the drive to give it some air flow). I haven't lost a single drive on my personal computers (which currently account for 3 comps and 9 hard drives out of the list above) since I started doing that about 9 years ago.
Thanks for the suggestions.

I run gaming cases (for the added cooling). This is the one I had before is this one. And my new case is this one.

Both had/have fans in the front. Air to drives should never have been an issue. I am gonna take my chances with SSD. I have a 1TB backup drive and no worries. I don't understand what the issue can be. I have changed SATA cables and everything and it don't seem to help. Maybe I just have really bad luck. lol
 
Old 02-04-2013, 05:24 AM   #17
Soderlund
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 131

Rep: Reputation: 53
It's the same thing with those damned cell phones. They are designed to break so you have to buy new ones all the time.

Reallocated_Sector_Ct means there are bad sectors.

The FAQ about Raw_Read_Error_Rate says:
Quote:
What details can be interpreted from Raw read error rate?

If no documentation is available, the RAW value of attribute 1 is typically useless. The 48-bit field might encode several values, try -v 1,hex48 to check.
However I think very high values means that there are few errors, while low values (like yours) means it's bad. But I see you already noticed that!

The values of WORST and THRESH seem to be more important than the raw values. I think WHEN_FAILED will say FAILING_NOW when WORST drops below THRESH.

I read in a report somewhere that once you get your first read error, the risk of failure increases significantly.

I read somewhere else (I have not tried it -- do it at your own risk!) that you can put a failed drive in the freezer to be able to plug it in for long enough to pull data from it.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Telling KsCD to read the other cd drive. stf92 Linux - Hardware 2 02-26-2010 09:54 PM
Telling whether a flash drive is USB 2.0 jeriryan Linux - Hardware 1 06-23-2008 01:55 PM
Suse is telling my my hard drive is 99.6% full :( xsithlordx Suse/Novell 9 04-14-2006 10:39 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration