LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-16-2006, 09:13 AM   #1
jimbo1954
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK.
Distribution: Debian and Fedora Core in equal measure
Posts: 256

Rep: Reputation: 33
KVM and Fedora Core 5


I have a bunch of servers, mostly Fedora Core 5, some Debian, some Ubuntu, and got tired of having as many screens as servers, so I got a Belkin 4-port KVM.

I found that in some cases if I booted a server when the KVM was not pointed at it, the server would boot (could ssh in OK), but when the KVM pointed at it, the screen would not work (just black, and obviously under those circumstances, I cannot be sure whether the keyboard or mouse works!!!)

I Googled about and it looks like using the FrameBuffer device is the way to fix this. I also found that if I appended the string "vga-0x318" or similar to the kernel command in Grub, the boot process was run through the Frame Buffer, but as soon as X-org took over the plot, I was again plunged into darkness.

What I need is the simplest, most dumbed-down howto to get framebuffer working at normal runtime, preferably on Fed Core 5, which seems to exhibit the problem most. I'm not a Unix Newbie, but I'm not *at all* knowledgeable about the video subsys, so treat me like a true dummy!

Thanks,
Jimbo
 
Old 10-16-2006, 09:18 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,379

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
what makes you think it's the frame buffer? i'd look a lot more towards the kvm itself. what happens when you boot up a machine with the kvm pointing at it? do you see the bios status screens? does it continue to boot correctly? no real reason to look towards the framebuffer in my own experience. what kind of kvm is it? a good old fachion ps/2 kvm is fairly bomb proff but for the more recent usb only ones it gets a lot more confusing for the kvm to present the correct dummy devices to the machine when the kvm is not live.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 09:27 AM   #3
jimbo1954
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK.
Distribution: Debian and Fedora Core in equal measure
Posts: 256

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 33
Thanks for the quick response!

The reason for suspecting Framebuffer may be the answer is that the only place I found a precise description of the problem in Google (after *hours* of search) was on an HP site, but it described the problem precisely, and the remedy was to deploy fb...as I mentioned, I'm a total dummy on X.org, so I could be straw-clutching.

I've tried a couple of Belkins, they are the common-or-garden 4 port variety, no frills sort (no sound, no USB), one my own, where the ports are ranged round the sides of the box (2 on one side, 2 on the other, screen, key,mouse on the ends) and the other (borrowed, with all ports down 1 side)

The KVM works fine on Windoze, and better on some versions of Linux, I'm wondering what happens when the boot process lets go and passes control to the X.org when x.org can't contact the screen...its like the screen and server don't get to sync to each other???
 
Old 10-16-2006, 09:37 AM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,379

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
ahh ok i think i see what you're getting at. essentially the logic is to use the most bog standard X driver as possible, so as to make it the most compatible. if you open /etc/X11/xorg.conf and find the Device section, change the Drive to "vesa" then restart X that will use the vesa 2.0 video hooks and nothing more. in fc5 in gnome you can also run system-config-display and choose vesa from the hardware list.
 
Old 10-16-2006, 09:40 AM   #5
jimbo1954
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: High Wycombe, Bucks, UK.
Distribution: Debian and Fedora Core in equal measure
Posts: 256

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 33
Already tried that....vesa works OK with a head directly connected, but barfs when KVM'ed. Incidentally, the server has an Intel mobo, with an E1000 on-board display subsys...don't know if that makes a diff?
 
  


Reply

Tags
fedora 5, framebuffer, kvm


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Setup Fedora core 3 & Redhat 7.2 software development environment under Fedora core 5 powah Fedora 1 06-16-2006 10:25 AM
Upgrade Fedora Core 4 (FC4) to Fedora Core 5 (FC5) hangs vogelap Fedora - Installation 10 05-22-2006 09:00 AM
can fedora core 4 be upgraded to fedora core 5 without a full reinstall lcornea Linux - Software 2 05-10-2006 07:58 AM
Severe problems with Fedora Core 1 and Fedora Core 2 installatiom TheOneKEA Fedora - Installation 2 07-14-2004 02:12 PM
Fedora Core 2 - Just days away! Final comments on Fedora Core 1 lrt2003 Fedora 3 05-12-2004 02:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration