Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Just out of pure curiosity:
What would happen (or rather, how would you choose) if you opened enough X's that you ran out of Fkeys. So, after CTRL ALT F12, where would you go?
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0, Slackware 8.1, Knoppix 3.7, Lunar 1.3, Sorcerer
Posts: 771
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by MasterC Just out of pure curiosity:
What would happen (or rather, how would you choose) if you opened enough X's that you ran out of Fkeys. So, after CTRL ALT F12, where would you go?
Cool
Funny, I tried it the day I learned about the possiblities that multiple displays offered. My conclusion was that you can open as many as you want, but cant get to the seventh and successive once you switch consoles.
Thanks... another "just out of curiosity" question to add:
If I startx on those different tty's, can I send them out to different displays (I'm assuming so, this would be a good reason to have that option)? If so, how? This assumes multiple displays, even if they are over a network.
This is nice.. And not only you could use many X but if you have any of them online, they are all online.. THis is great, now i could use one with KDE menu and the other one with GNOME..
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0, Slackware 8.1, Knoppix 3.7, Lunar 1.3, Sorcerer
Posts: 771
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by MasterC Thanks... another "just out of curiosity" question to add:
If I startx on those different tty's, can I send them out to different displays (I'm assuming so, this would be a good reason to have that option)? If so, how? This assumes multiple displays, even if they are over a network.
Thanks for the info so far!
Cool
sure, why not. You can export the DISPLAY variable on the shell from which you launch the x app ( client); lets say xeyes. You want the xeyes to be served by the x server running at a different box running at vt 8 ( Ctrl + Shift + F8 ) and having display number 2.
export DISPLAY=<xserverip>:2
xeyes
or for a one time thing..
xeyes -display <serverip>:2
ohh. this assumes you have started x without --no-listen tcp and you have proper authentication in terms of xhost or MIT-MAGIC-COOKIEs. Otherwise the server will refuse the connection.
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0, Slackware 8.1, Knoppix 3.7, Lunar 1.3, Sorcerer
Posts: 771
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by boreo This is nice.. And not only you could use many X but if you have any of them online, they are all online.. THis is great, now i could use one with KDE menu and the other one with GNOME..
yup, kde and gnome are just a bunch of X client apps including a window manager for each. You can run as many different window managers as you want as you have X servers.
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0, Slackware 8.1, Knoppix 3.7, Lunar 1.3, Sorcerer
Posts: 771
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by Grim Reaper omg, this kicks arse!! w00t, now i can run Games on one X session, while surf on the other, and 'alt tab' so to speak between the two quite easily
/me bows down to startx -- :2
Sure does. I dont play too many games so there must be some reason I can't see now that make me want to ask if you _really_ need multiple X servers for what gaming/surfing. Cant one use multiple workspaces?
I was thinking something, does running too many X servers take RAM space in some way? Or the RAM focus on the one you are using at the time and the other just are taken care by the virtual memory/swap partition, I don't know if I make any sence.. But any ideas?
Of course loading an extra X server is going to take up RAM and CPU cycles, shouldn't be two much tho is there isn't a heavily active process running on the other server. Use 'top' to find out what exactly is happening.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.