Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
We have about 300 users in the systeme , they mainly use the software called "netterm" to telnet our RH server to access the db in our internal network , I know there are some secure program like ssh , that is more secure for connection , do you think it is good idea to replace the software in our case ? what it the advantage and impact ? could provide any recommendation ? thx in advance.
In my opinion, telnet is(and should) be obsolete by now.
In college one of my professors was a security consultant for this big computer company. The companie's number one piece of advice to its clients was to encrypt everything. They felt this is the first line of defense in computer security. After all, if somebody does break your firewall, sniff your network, and steal some information going around your network what good would it be to them if the packets are encrypted?
Also, even if nobody from outside the network hacks in, your network is vulnerable from the inside. Do you trust every single one of your 300 employees? They could be sniffing each other's passwords and doing who knows what with that information. (Although... I think that only certain types of network topologies are susceptible to packet sniffing... so depending on what yours is, you might not need ssh... but I think I'm talking out of my ass here in this bracketed off section... in any case, if I were you, I'd feel a lot more secure with ssh).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.