Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The difference between a 586 and a 686 is a semantic rather than real architectural difference. The 'Pent' in Pentium means 5 hence 586.
Eg. 386 was the first Intel (hence I386) to have 32-bit data and address busses and emulates a degree of concurrency (windows 3.1 for example could run literally hundreds of windows at the same time). 486 was a complex instruction reduced register computer (more operations using less memory) and a few other minor enhancements.
In short, from what I can see the difference between 586 and 686 is basically the difference between PII and PIII (or celeron if you're a cheapskate). PII with MMX is called I686 because Intel thought they could sell more computers if they incremented the identifying architecture number. (Hey it worked for Sun and Java!).
It's therefore probably got more to do with marketing than innovation.
If SQL is pronounced 'sequel', is HTML pronounced 'hutmul'?
no, cos SQL used to be called SeQueL (by the developers i think), but eventually just gave in and called it SQL, and it's pronounced esskewell now in general ;-)
personally i tink it should have been called SQuirreL. seems nicer to me.
i thought 586 uses mmx optimizations and therefore would not run on earlier models (ie a 486), and i thought 686 uses sse optimization. and when you are configuring your kernel, i think the 'Athlon' option uses 3dnow! optimizations. i don't think code compiled for a specific processor feature set, like sse or 3dnow, will work correctly on a chip that is lacking that feature set. but using the optimizations allows the compiled program to run faster on machines that support it. so if you have a 486, binaries that say '586' in their name probably won't work on your computer. for ultimate compatibility, i believe many programs are still compiled for i386, or 'x86' so that they can run on any pc. but maybe i am mistaken.
Originally posted by Bert I prefer 'sequential query language' (SQurreLs good too though!) as there's nothing 'structured' about Structured Query Language.
yeah i see what you mean about the sequential bit, i find that with MySQL
why doesn't it do constraints? how else am i meant to do it? why doesn't it comply to the sql api? how come it just crashed? where's that oracle download site?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.