Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm new to Redhat and Linux altogether and am running RH8. I have what seems to be i586 running on my machine but the CDs I have seem to be i386. (got the CDs from one place and the install on my own machine from another...)
What's the difference between these if any, and can I use my 386 CDs with my 586 installation?
In this case i386 is just referring to the generic arcitechture of the target platform. You want the i386 for anything from a '386 right up to P4, including Athlon, Smeleron and varieties.If you're running PPC, ia64, sparc, or other arch's then you're in for an interesting venture.
Distribution: Trying Mandrake 9.0, but I don't know yet
Follow up question re: Mandrake i586
Originally posted by mcleodnine In this case i386 is just referring to the generic arcitechture of the target platform. You want the i386 for anything from a '386 right up to P4, including Athlon, Smeleron and varieties.If you're running PPC, ia64, sparc, or other arch's then you're in for an interesting venture.
I'm planning on installing Mandrake 9, which I got from a .iso file on the internet. The full file name is: Mandrake90-cd1-inst.i586.iso. I got from the above post that i586 refers to the architecture. Will it work on a computer with a pentium 233 processor?
The (and this nick is not an attempt to be 1337. Honest!) Incubus
686 is the Pentium Pro and anything built on it... PII, P!!!, Celeron, P4.
As Bulliver said, you can use lower packages on a higher chip. Higher chips have all the instructions of the lower chips, plus more... MMX, SSE, SSE2, and what-not. So, packages built on a higher chip might have instructions in it from the newer set, and might not run if you try them on a lower chip.
I have always used arc i386 on three of my linux servers. The fourth one is an Athlon. Again, I installed 386 on it. But it seems to crash often, while the others don't. The other servers experience little load, but the Athlon is the main server.
I also upgraded it to kernel 2.4.18-19.8.0, and it crashes even when I compile (amanda) using a normal account. Syslog spits out "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ..."
Does anyone know if I can use 386 on Athlon? and if so, has anyone experienced it??