Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-11-2007, 06:53 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Gentoo, Kubuntu
Posts: 353
Rep:
|
How do I avoid bad memory?
My kernel is 2.6.19.2 and I have 2 x 512MB memory.
I have a few bad bits that memtest indicates are around the 830MB mark.
I'm told that I can add mem=800M to the kernel parameter list. However that won't work if memory is allocated from highest address down, which I'm told is a possibility.
Does the kernel allocate memory from high address to low, or low to high?
TIA
Jim
|
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 10:51 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,128
Rep: 
|
Couldn't you just add new memory to get rid of the actual problem? It's rather cheap nowadays.. 
|
|
|
|
06-11-2007, 02:12 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast, U.S.A.
Distribution: Fedora (Desktop), CentOS (Server), Knoppix (Diags)
Posts: 934
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by trickykid
Couldn't you just add new memory to get rid of the actual problem? It's rather cheap nowadays.. 
|
+1
If you've got a few bad bits already, you're probably looking at an increase later, and more problems later.
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 01:36 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
If memtest indicates bad RAM, replace it. OTOH, could the issue be simply that you need to enable high memory support? See sapphirecat's article on the Linux memory management, section 2. HTH
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 06:35 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Gentoo, Kubuntu
Posts: 353
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks. I swapped memory with my backup system and tested the 2 cards individually. A lot more errors this time on the bad card. I plan on replacing my main machine with a 64-bit model in the near future so I really cannot justify new memory at this time.
Jim
|
|
|
|
06-12-2007, 12:12 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: debian, knoppix
Posts: 80
Rep:
|
Don't rub your shoes on the floor and then touch the memory.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|