LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2003, 12:13 PM   #286
cfigueiredo
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Lisboa, Portugal
Distribution: Mandrake
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Wink disk performance


Hi:
My Toshiba laptop with a 10 GB fujitsu mhm2100at reads
64MB in 3.84 sec = 16.67 MB/sec
 
Old 07-16-2003, 07:42 PM   #287
DavidPhillips
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,163

Rep: Reputation: 58
hp laptop

Disk /dev/hda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

default redhat 9 install

/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq = 0 (off)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 8 (on)
geometry = 7296/255/63, sectors = 117210240, start = 0


/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.40 seconds =320.00 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.25 seconds = 28.44 MB/sec



Last edited by DavidPhillips; 07-16-2003 at 07:44 PM.
 
Old 07-20-2003, 08:31 AM   #288
mike L
Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Distribution: SuSE 10 (SLED)
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
/dev/hda
timing buffered disk reads 64 MB in 2.74 seconds = 23.36 MB / sec.

/dev/hdb
timing buffered disk reads 64 MB in 2.42 seconds = 26.45 MB / sec.
 
Old 07-21-2003, 04:26 AM   #289
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,940

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.35 seconds = 47.41 MB/sec
[root@localhost root]# hdparm -t /dev/hdb

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.73 seconds = 17.16 MB/sec
[root@localhost root]# hdparm -t /dev/hdb5

/dev/hdb5:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.42 seconds = 45.07 MB/sec


Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 60GB (both drives)
ATA/133 2MB buffer
7200 RPM
Logical CHS 16,383/16/63
Avg seek <9.3ms
Avg latency 4.2ms

hda is RedHat 9
hdb is Windoze XP
hdb5 is data partition on XP

Built the box here last Oct. Bought the 2nd hd in the States in May. Was intending to setup RAID0, but installed RedHat 9 on the second drive instead.

Will either change RH to, or add, Debian in a few hours :-)
 
Old 07-22-2003, 10:38 AM   #290
crashmeister
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541

Rep: Reputation: 47
/dev/hdb
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.28 seconds =465.45 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.40 seconds =45.88 MB/sec

Measly Maxtor fireball aka. 2F040L0 5400 rpm with 40 GB - interesting;bout the same speed.
 
Old 07-22-2003, 10:52 AM   #291
DrOzz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,185

Rep: Reputation: 60
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.18 seconds = 29.36 MB/sec
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 15.01 seconds = 4.26 MB/sec
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.08 seconds = 30.74 MB/sec

hda = 60gig Western Digital WD600BB-32CCB0
hdb = 20gig Maxtor 2F020J0
hdc = 80gig Western Digital WD800BB-00CAA0

i dont' know why the 20gig is soo damn slow, its the newest and fastest drive of the three...think there is somethign fishy going on there
 
Old 07-23-2003, 09:29 AM   #292
lokee
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 381

Rep: Reputation: 30
HD performance contest!

This contest is simply a way to make some people realize that they are not using the full potential of their Hard Drive!
I'll show you...

Logged in as root do this:
[root@localhost]$/sbin/hdparm -tT /dev/(drive)
Replace (drive) with the nam of your physical drive(probably hda or hdb)

You'll proably get something similar to this:

/dev/(drive):
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.34 seconds =95.52 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 17.86 seconds = 3.58 MB/sec


This is a BAD result...

Read this:
[url]http://tldp.org/LDP/solrhe/Securing-Optimizing-Linux-The-Ultimate-Solution-v2.0.pdf[/url
The section wich interests us for now is: Chapter 5, General System Optimization and Chapter 6.

Watch out, the books is not new; apply it's directive carefully...
Note: In the 'IDE performace tuning' section, it says +=RH7.1 optimizes the HD automatically... it doesn't really do it(from what I see)!

Then redo an hdparm -tT, AND...
/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.42 seconds =304.76 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.58 seconds = 40.51 MB/sec


This is my story(for real)...

So, what your result?

Last edited by lokee; 07-23-2003 at 09:31 AM.
 
Old 07-23-2003, 10:38 AM   #293
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
Lokee,

I merged your last thread with an already existing thread in which we have many contributing to. No need for a separate thread. This makes it easier for others when searching or browsing to find relevant information in all one place, instead spread across the forums.

Regards.
 
Old 07-23-2003, 11:18 AM   #294
mason75
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Cologne, Germany
Distribution: slack 9
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
hi folks,

here's mine:

IBM-DJNA-352500
[root@gondor: root]# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.44 seconds =290.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.30 seconds = 14.88 MB/sec


IBM-IC35L060AVVA07-0
[root@gondor: root]# hdparm -tT /dev/hdc

/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.44 seconds =290.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.40 seconds = 45.71 MB/sec
 
Old 07-23-2003, 04:18 PM   #295
bkknight
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Irvine, CA
Distribution: Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
64 mb in 3.08 second = 20.78 MB/sec
40 gig laptop dirve, i think 4200 rpm
 
Old 07-23-2003, 10:14 PM   #296
chilly007
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Maxtor fireball 20gb 5400

hdparm -tT /dev/hda

Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 mb in 0.97 seconds =131.96 MB/sec

Timing buffered disk reads: 64 mb in 1.77 seconds = 36.16 MB/s
 
Old 07-24-2003, 01:33 AM   #297
mhchavez99
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Lawrence, KS
Distribution: Mandrake9.1
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Western digital Caviar 7,200 rpm 80 GB

Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.33 seconds =387.88 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.36 seconds = 27.12 MB/sec

achieved using the following:

multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 3 (32-bit w/sync)
unmaskirq = 0 (off)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 8 (on)
 
Old 07-25-2003, 10:14 PM   #298
synaptical
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Mint 13/15, CentOS 6.4
Posts: 2,020

Rep: Reputation: 48
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.22 seconds =581.82 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.37 seconds = 46.72 MB/sec

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.22 seconds =581.82 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.11 seconds = 57.66 MB/sec



Last edited by synaptical; 08-09-2003 at 10:58 AM.
 
Old 07-28-2003, 05:24 AM   #299
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Arch, Gentoo
Posts: 6,940

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
HD performance after hdparm tune up...

lokee,

Thanks for the link. Now for the improvements vs. post # 289

debian:/usr/src/linux# hdparm -Tt /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.28 seconds =457.14 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.34 seconds = 47.76 MB/sec


And the -I option vs. -i option is a big help, too.

debian:/usr/src/linux# hdparm -I /dev/hda

/dev/hda:

non-removable ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: Maxtor 6Y060L0
Serial Number: Y2VRB7SE
Firmware Revision: YAR41VW0
Standards:
Supported: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Likely used: 7
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
bytes/track: 0 (obsolete)
bytes/sector: 0 (obsolete)
current sector capacity: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors = 120103200
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
Buffer size: 2048.0kB ECC bytes: 57 Queue depth: 1
Standby timer values: spec'd by standard, no device specific minimum
r/w multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 0
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* NOP cmd
* READ BUFFER cmd
* WRITE BUFFER cmd
* Host Protected Area feature set
* look-ahead
* write cache
* Power Management feature set
Security Mode feature set
* SMART feature set
SET MAX security extension
Advanced Power Management feature set
* DOWNLOAD MICROCODE cmd
Security:
Master password revision code = 65534
supported
not enabled
not locked
not frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
HW reset results:
CBLID- above Vih
Device num = 0 determined by the jumper
Checksum: correct
 
Old 07-28-2003, 02:19 PM   #300
boreo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Dominican Republic
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD, RedHat
Posts: 326

Rep: Reputation: 30
Western Digital 20GB (IDE)
[root@localhost root]# hdparm -Tt /dev/hdb

/dev/hdb:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.21 seconds =609.52 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.24 seconds = 28.57 MB/sec
[root@localhost root]# hdparm -I /dev/hdb

/dev/hdb:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD200BB-00DEA0
Serial Number: Edited my post to take this off lol
Firmware Revision: 05.03ER2
Standards:
Supported: 5 4 3 2
Likely used: 6
Configuration:
Logical max current
cylinders 16383 16383
heads 16 16
sectors/track 63 63
--
CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
LBA user addressable sectors: 39102336
device size with M = 1024*1024: 19092 MBytes
device size with M = 1000*1000: 20020 MBytes (20 GB)
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
bytes avail on r/w long: 40 Queue depth: 1
Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, with device specific minimum
R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16
Recommended acoustic management value: 128, current value: 254
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* READ BUFFER cmd
* WRITE BUFFER cmd
* Host Protected Area feature set
* Look-ahead
* Write cache
* Power Management feature set
Security Mode feature set
* SMART feature set
* Device Configuration Overlay feature set
Automatic Acoustic Management feature set
SET MAX security extension
* DOWNLOAD MICROCODE cmd
* SMART self-test
* SMART error logging
Security:
supported
not enabled
not locked
not frozen
not expired: security count
not supported: enhanced erase
HW reset results:
CBLID- above Vih
Device num = 1 determined by CSEL
Checksum: correct

Last edited by boreo; 07-28-2003 at 02:21 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test Hard Drive performance? voxel Linux - Hardware 7 09-07-2005 01:44 AM
Horrible Hard Drive Performance????? linux-rulz Linux - Hardware 13 06-26-2005 08:10 PM
hard drive performance true_atlantis Linux - General 3 10-26-2004 03:15 AM
Did not get the Hard drive performance Raid0! alpha97 Linux - Hardware 21 07-24-2004 03:52 AM
hard drive performance bynaar Slackware 2 12-18-2002 06:21 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration