LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2005, 10:39 AM   #1
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Rep: Reputation: 15
Gnome is so slow...


Hey Everybody,

I just installed Ubuntu linux, and I like it, sort of. The only main problem is that all of my windows are so slow! Once I have a few things open (firefox, thunderbird, gaim) it takes a good five seconds to switch between windows! What kind of solutions are there to this problem? Could I try switching to fluxbox(I'm using whatever the default gnome window manager is)? I'm really annoyed, because I want to sell my copy of Windows XP, but linux is just hogging my processer power far to easily (I have a 1GHz Celeron, is that the problem?). I know my RAM is alright, I'm only using half of it. What would you people suggest me doing?

Thanks so much!

Luke D
 
Old 02-08-2005, 11:31 AM   #2
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170

Rep: Reputation: 45
Well 1 GHz isn't much for gnome. Gnome and kde are resource hogs. Fluxbox is a lot faster (used on its own) but some programs will run kind of slow on slower processors. You have to use only fluxbox though, using fluxbox within gnome won't give much difference I'd say since gnome is where the bloatedness is. I have a 733 MHz and it works pretty well. Another thing to look at is the background processes you have running. If you don't need them just disable them.

WinXp isn't running fast at your PC either isn't it?
 
Old 02-08-2005, 11:41 AM   #3
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Hey,

Thaks for the response.

Yes, XP does run slow, but once I have windows open, it's not hard to change between them. The main reason I am switching to linux is just to speed things up.

I might try switching to fluxbox. We'll see.

Luke
 
Old 02-08-2005, 11:57 AM   #4
LinuxDave
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
1Ghz is a pretty fast machine. Gnome (and KDE) should be able to run well on 1Ghz processor. I am able to run Gnome and KDE reasonably well on a 300Mhz system.

I find that RAM is most important for Gnome/KDE. If you have 256Mb or more, than you shouldn't have much slowness problems (this goes for winXP as well). KDE and Gnome also runs fine on 128Mb (winXP can be very slow with only 128). With less than 128Mb, I would expect KDE/GNOME to be slow.

I do not know why you are experiencing such slowdown problems on your system. I do not think that a 1Ghz with 256Mb (or more) should be running that slow.

Running other window managers instead of the full desktop environments KDE and Gnome will definately help on a lesser machine. Fluxbox, mwm, fvwm, twm and many other window managers require very few resources.

It is possible to run X with a really low-resouce window manager (twm,mwm,fvwm) with a slow pentium and only 8-16 Mb ram with good performance.

LinuxDave
 
Old 02-08-2005, 12:09 PM   #5
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I was going to say

Thanks for that reply

The main reason I'm kind of concerned is that my 75MHz computer with 50 RAM is able to switch between dillo and sylphweed in less than a second (amazing!) with fluxbox. So, I guess I'm now on a quest to get fluxbox working. My main delema is getting apt-get to work again, so thanks for your help everybody!

If you do have some type of clue as to what may be going on with me, I would be very happy to hear it!!

Also, the loading between windows is only three seconds or so when I don't have as much stuff open. Must be the cache

Luke
 
Old 02-08-2005, 01:14 PM   #6
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170

Rep: Reputation: 45
Well if I run KDE or gnome on my 733 mHz with 128 MB it runs nowhere near reasonable or fine. But well I don't like them anyway,

What's wrong with your apt?
 
Old 02-08-2005, 01:21 PM   #7
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Hehe, since you're asking:



Code:
root@ubuntu:/home/luke # apt-get install libice-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libice-dev is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
9 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up gs-esp (7.07.1-9ubuntu2) ...
/usr/share/doc-base/gs-esp: cannot open control file for reading: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing gs-esp (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ijsgimpprint:
 ijsgimpprint depends on gs (>= 6.53) | gs-esp (>= 6.53) | gs-aladdin (>= 7.04); however:
  Package gs is not installed.
  Package gs-esp is not configured yet.
  Package gs-aladdin is not installed.
dpkg: error processing ijsgimpprint (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of cupsys:
 cupsys depends on gs-esp; however:
  Package gs-esp is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing cupsys (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of foomatic-db-gimp-print:
 foomatic-db-gimp-print depends on ijsgimpprint (>= 4.2.6-5ubuntu2); however:
  Package ijsgimpprint is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing foomatic-db-gimp-print (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of hpijs:
 hpijs depends on gs-esp (>= 7.05) | gs-gpl (>= 6.53) | gs-afpl (>= 7.04-2); however:
  Package gs-esp is not configured yet.
  Package gs-gpl is not installed.
  Package gs-afpl is not installed.
dpkg: error processing hpijs (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of foomatic-db-hpijs:
 foomatic-db-hpijs depends on hpijs (>> 1.3); however:
  Package hpijs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing foomatic-db-hpijs (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnome-gv:
 gnome-gv depends on gs-esp | gs; however:
  Package gs-esp is not configured yet.
  Package gs is not installed.
  Package gs-esp which provides gs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing gnome-gv (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pnm2ppa:
 pnm2ppa depends on gs; however:
  Package gs is not installed.
  Package gs-esp which provides gs is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing pnm2ppa (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ubuntu-desktop:
 ubuntu-desktop depends on cupsys; however:
  Package cupsys is not configured yet.
 ubuntu-desktop depends on foomatic-db-gimp-print; however:
  Package foomatic-db-gimp-print is not configured yet.
 ubuntu-desktop depends on foomatic-db-hpijs; however:
  Package foomatic-db-hpijs is not configured yet.
 ubuntu-desktop depends on gnome-gv; however:
  Package gnome-gv is not configured yet.
 ubuntu-desktop depends on pnm2ppa; however:
  Package pnm2ppa is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing ubuntu-desktop (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 gs-esp
 ijsgimpprint
 cupsys
 foomatic-db-gimp-print
 hpijs
 foomatic-db-hpijs
 gnome-gv
 pnm2ppa
 ubuntu-desktop
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

That is the error I get every time I run apt. It used to work fine, but now it's giving me all these problems.

What do you guys think of Xfce? I'm working on moving over to it (if I can get apt to work :P)

Thanks for anything!



EDIT: I somehow got fluxbox "working" so I logged in using flux instead of gnome, and when I right-click for my menu, it gives me a completely empty one. It just has the the restart, exit, and xterm options... how can I get all my programs in there? Just a side question that would be nice to know

Luke

Last edited by totalshredder; 02-08-2005 at 01:28 PM.
 
Old 02-08-2005, 02:09 PM   #8
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170

Rep: Reputation: 45
For the fluxbox menu you have to edit the ~/.fluxbox/menu file. The syntax is pretty easy. Check the fluxbox documentation on how to do it.

The problem with apt is like the output posted that you miss some packages that are needed for another package to work. The output gives which packages are missing. First I'd try "apt-get install -f" which will try to solve dependency problems (though I have the feeling it doesn't do well in Ubuntu from other threads on the board) If that doesn't work start installing packages it says it misses and run "dpkg --pending --configure" after it till everything works and you get no error messages anymore.

XFCE is a bit better than kde and gnome in terms of speed. It's a bit less minimalistic than fluxbox but I didn't think those options were so good I'd ditch fluxbox in favour of XFCE. It's sort of KDE/gnome without all the programs like office etc. But I still like fluxbox more since it doesn't give me less in options but gives me more speed.
 
Old 02-08-2005, 02:17 PM   #9
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Hey, thanks for those tips!

EDIT2: I think I might have some serious gnome problems, like when I try to run fluxbox *****.deb it gives me an error as well as when I try to run that menu file. the error is:

Could not display "*******"
There was an error launching the application.

Strange, I'll have to edit the file in vim...

EDIT: Tried the apt-get things you mentioned, and both gave me the same errors.... strange stuff!

EDIT 3: The fluxbox menu file is empty! Is that normal? I'll have to try to find some way to add files to it.

Luke

Last edited by totalshredder; 02-08-2005 at 02:28 PM.
 
Old 02-08-2005, 02:28 PM   #10
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170

Rep: Reputation: 45
Did you keep installing the missing packages it listed?

It's the ~/.fluxbox/menu file. ~/.fluxbox is a folder in your home directory. If it's not there just create the folder .fluxbox and then create a file called menu in it which you change to your liking.
 
Old 02-08-2005, 02:30 PM   #11
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Yes, I found it, it was hidden, and empty. I think I am at the point of reinstalling ubuntu, as I might have somehow messed something up. I'll get back to ya'll on how it works

Luke
 
Old 02-12-2005, 07:35 AM   #12
Haiyadragon
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Gorredijk, Netherlands
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 400

Rep: Reputation: 30
Most Gnome packagers tend to add alot of extra stuff that slows it down massively. The first Gnome I tried was on Mandrake...well by far the slowest I tried. Then Dropline Gnome. It seemed fast, but now I would call it less slow (lots of bloat). Ubuntu is about the same speed as Dropline, maybe a little faster depending on your setup. I recently installed Slackware 10.0 without a DE and then I installed the Gnome packages from here with a few exceptions (apps like Gaim and Abiword, I like to install the latest versions). Lightning speed! It feels lighter then KDE (something I didn't think was possible). Nothing beats this (well maybe in speed but not in speed+sweetness ).

edit: I guess the next step would be to compile it myself...... I tried it but it's quite a mountain to climb.

Last edited by Haiyadragon; 02-12-2005 at 07:38 AM.
 
Old 02-12-2005, 03:35 PM   #13
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Okay everybody,

Everything is working well, but I really, really want to switch over to fluxbox, as I really just like it more than kde or gnome (they're too flashy). So I used apt-get and got fluxbox. Except I have the same problem as I had last time, the menu is completely empty (sept for xterm,restart,stop). I edited the menu file, and it didn't work at all. What can I do? Where is some good documentation on this... nobody else knows my sorrow

Luke
 
Old 02-12-2005, 03:40 PM   #14
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,170

Rep: Reputation: 45
Can you post the menu file you wrote. I think you just made some error in there which is the problem.

Try this, info from the official site. Did you look for it there

http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/docbook/en/html/
 
Old 02-12-2005, 03:47 PM   #15
totalshredder
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Philly... "Brotherly Love"
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 43

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Hey! Good Site! Thanks for that.

Anyways, here's what I had:

Code:
[begin] (Luke's Menu)

[submenu] (internet utils)
	[exec] (gaim) {gaim}
	[exec] (firefox) {firefox}
	[exec] (thunderbird) {mozilla-thunderbird}
	[exec] (xchat) {xchat}
	[exec] (gnomemeeting) {gnomemeeting}
[submenu] (Accessories)
	[exec] (gedit) {gedit %U}
	[exec] (calculator) {gcalctool}
[submenu] (Office)
	[exec] (OpenOffice Writer) {/usr/bin/oowriter %U}
	[exec] (OpenOffice Spreadsheet) {/usr/bin/oocalc %U}
[submenu] (Multimedia)
	[exec] (The Gimp) {gimp-remote-2.0 %U}
[submenu] (System Tools)
	[exec] (Root Terminal) {gksudo /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator}
	[exec] (Terminal) {gnome-terminal}
	[exec] (Synaptic) {gksudo /usr/sbin/synaptic}
	[exec] (Users and Groups) {gksudo users-admin}

[end]
Is there something wrong with it? I honestly think flux just isn't picking it up...

Luke
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gnome 2.6 slow 3.14159 Linux - Software 0 12-10-2004 07:13 AM
Gnome starting REALLY slow schteelhead Slackware - Installation 3 09-02-2004 11:46 AM
gnome / metacity became very slow... LarryDoliver Red Hat 3 10-09-2003 01:25 PM
KDE and GNOME very slow pudhiyavan Linux - General 9 10-08-2003 04:30 PM
Is Gnome 2.2 painfully slow for anyone else? guitargeek General 0 03-30-2003 10:39 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:39 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration