Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by steve_d555 Subject asks all... For Gentoo which should i use the regular(2.4) or smp(2.6)?
Thnx
--steve
Well, do you know what the smp kernel does actually? Its mainly for systems that use or have more than one processor on the motherboard. If you don't have two cpu's or more, there's really no need for it. Find and compile a regular or custom kernel if you want 2.6.x for your kernel.
Originally posted by steve_d555 Ya, I knew it was for multiple processors, but I've heard of people using it for the 2.6 because of problems with 2.4
Thnx
Steve
I've had no problems with 2.4.x series. It's a proven reliable kernel. Most upgrade kernels to add support previous versions didn't have or to patch security issues. I'd say, get the 2.6 kernel if you want it but compile it to suit your own needs, why have a kernel compiled with support you don't need? Just a thought.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.