LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2007, 04:19 PM   #1
moljac024
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Serbia, Europe
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 54

Rep: Reputation: 15
File system that works best for both Linux and BSD


Hi, i'm planning a dual-boot installaion of a Linux distribution and FreeBSD.

I would make separate partitions (on a separate hard drive) just for storing data and sharing it between the two...so what would be the best file system for doing that ? Ext2, ext3, fat32 ... ?

I think my best bet would be to go for ext2 but i'm not so sure about that, so i'm asking you about your opinions.

Last edited by moljac024; 08-07-2007 at 07:07 PM.
 
Old 08-08-2007, 02:52 AM   #2
themanwhowas
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: CentOS 5, Fedora 23
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 29
i've never seen the bsd file system as an option in any linux install that i have performed. when installing freebsd however you can choose the ext2 file system. make of this what you will, i dont know the compatibility of the 2 this is just an obserbation
 
Old 08-08-2007, 06:19 AM   #3
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
It may be better to hold off a little, until FreeBSD 7.0. It is planned to introduce full rw support for ext3 and xfs. Maybe writing to ext3 is already supported in 6.2 but it certainly wasn't yet in 6.0 and xfs is almost entirely missing. Fat would be an option but then fat comes with its known limitations (you can't set permissions and it defragments rather too easily). Ext2 should work but will make booting slower because it requires regular fscks due to the absence of a journal.

Last edited by jay73; 08-08-2007 at 06:46 AM.
 
Old 08-08-2007, 06:30 AM   #4
moljac024
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Location: Serbia, Europe
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 54

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I am currently using DesktopBSD (which is actually FreeBSD 6.2 with a graphical installer) and i am able to read-write to my ext3 partition.

But i was wondering if there were some better alternatives, and now i see there aren't. Thanks!
 
Old 08-08-2007, 07:05 AM   #5
theYinYeti
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: France
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 1,897

Rep: Reputation: 66
Ext3 is a good filesystem anyway.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
scp from a linux behaving strange and fubar'ing permissions on destination bsd system rg.viza Linux - Security 3 07-07-2007 03:00 PM
want to make tri boot system with windows,Linux and BSD anupamcbr *BSD 11 05-26-2006 07:54 AM
when does linux switch from realmode file system to protectedmode file system sitthar Linux - General 3 04-08-2006 08:05 AM
Three-boot system Win XP - Linux RH - Free BSD does not work tuanito *BSD 6 02-24-2003 04:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration