Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Distribution: Fedora14,Scientific 6.1?, Mandriva 2010 ;GO MAGEIA!!!Next up Gentoo
Posts: 697
Rep:
Emacs is how much more than a text editor?
I was reading how you could browse the net with Emacs but then it was stated that it was done with another application like Firefox so this would imply that Emacs is an interpreter would it not?
So my questions is;
What is Emacs capable of? Is it an interpreter that runs a text editor?
Emacs is a pretty good operating system, but it could use a better text editor
On a serious note, emacs is a powerful beast. It's extremely extendable. AFAIK, all the extensions are written in ELisp (Emacs Lisp). One of them is W3 - a text-based web browser.
I think you were referring to it.
Quote:
What is Emacs capable of?
The question should be: what is emacs NOT capable of?! It's a very powerful tool for programmers. Personally, apart from writing code, I've used emacs for the following:
- email
- usenet
- LaTex
- diary/todo list/notes (org-mode is probably one of the most amazing emacs extensions)
That does look pretty cool. I always see all these neat things that Emacs can do and try it out again for about 5 minutes, then when I start editing text I go running back to Vim with my tail between my legs. (I don't mean to start up that holy war again, please don't take it that way). I should probably force myself to learn all the keybinds and stick with it for a week or two.
I was reading how you could browse the net with Emacs but then it was stated that it was done with another application like Firefox so this would imply that Emacs is an interpreter would it not?
There isn't really any clear cut division between being an interpreter or not. At any rate w3 is a browser written in Emacs Lisp, and emacs-w3m is an emacs interface to the w3m textmode browser.
Distribution: Fedora14,Scientific 6.1?, Mandriva 2010 ;GO MAGEIA!!!Next up Gentoo
Posts: 697
Original Poster
Rep:
I respect Emacs.
I should have asked if " Is Emacs a pioneer of IDEs" and was this the original intention or did it evolve towards this. I seriously want a 8 by 10 photo of Stallman and Torvalds on my office wall. If people inquire who they are I react with absolute astonishment like it is the most blatant lack of respect that I have ever witnessed.
I should have asked if " Is Emacs a pioneer of IDEs" and was this the original intention or did it evolve towards this. I seriously want a 8 by 10 photo of Stallman and Torvalds on my office wall. If people inquire who they are I react with absolute astonishment like it is the most blatant lack of respect that I have ever witnessed.
Well, I guess you'll be astonished on a daily basis
Quote:
Is Emacs a pioneer of IDEs" and was this the original intention or did it evolve towards this.
I have no idea about that (you'd have to ask RMS) but I'd risk guessing that it evolved towards what we now call an IDE.
The original EMACS consisted of a set of Editor MACroS for the TECO editor.
So at first, it wasn't an editor at all, but an extension for TECO (Tape Editor and Corrector, later Text Editor and Corrector), the editor of Incompatible Timesharing System (ITS).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.