LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

View Poll Results: Does Your Primary Linux Desktop Have An HDD or SSD?
HDD 495 69.52%
SSD 217 30.48%
Voters: 712. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2013, 12:42 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,421

Rep: Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628
Does Your Primary Linux Desktop Have An HDD or SSD?


Based on feedback in this thread, the official LQ polls continue. This poll will be followed by a Server-related poll asking the same question.

--jeremy
 
Old 10-07-2013, 01:22 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,592
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047
I guess the poll wants to know which is the primary disk in my primary machine (the one where my OSes are on), so I voted for SSD here (also since all my other machines except the fileserver run on SSDs, too). Nonetheless there is also a LVM bundle of two HDDs in my main machine.
 
Old 10-07-2013, 01:28 PM   #3
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,421

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628Reputation: 2628
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
I guess the poll wants to know which is the primary disk in my primary machine (the one where my OSes are on)
That's correct.

--jeremy
 
Old 10-07-2013, 01:34 PM   #4
nonamedotc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 343

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I do not yet have a SSD - way too expensive for me now. I use HDD everywhere.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-07-2013, 07:21 PM   #5
jefro
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 11,722

Rep: Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439Reputation: 1439
I had to get one when the price came down enough on the larger models.
 
Old 10-07-2013, 07:30 PM   #6
suicidaleggroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045
I won't build a computer anymore without an SSD boot/OS drive, be it laptop or desktop.

---------- Post added 10-07-13 at 06:31 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nonamedotc View Post
I do not yet have a SSD - way too expensive for me now. I use HDD everywhere.
SSDs are incredibly cheap now, compared to just a couple of years ago.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-07-2013, 08:03 PM   #7
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 73
I voted SSD because my system is on an SSD while the data goes onto a large HDD.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 02:23 AM   #8
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,019

Rep: Reputation: 307Reputation: 307Reputation: 307Reputation: 307
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozar View Post
I voted SSD because my system is on an SSD while the data goes onto a large HDD.
that's the configuration I use with my HTPC which runs off an SSD, but uses (currently) two large HDDs for audio and video contents. Of course, these HDDs are spun down when not in use.

However, my primary system I'm using for everyday work is a traditional HDD-only setup, which is why I voted for HDD.

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 10-08-2013, 06:24 AM   #9
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,281
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446
Member Response

Hi,

For my working Laptop, I too use a hybrid system with my primary OS using a SSD with long term archive data & storage on a external HDD.

Costs for small footprint consumer SSD have fallen. I like OCZ & Patriot for fair priced drives that are reliable. Intel SSD costs are starting to fall in price for consumer drives at popular resellers.

A good resourceful SSD wiki: http://www.ssdwiki.com/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-08-2013, 06:38 AM   #10
pan64
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian i686 (solaris)
Posts: 4,928

Rep: Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305Reputation: 1305
as it was already mentioned: os on ssd, data on hdd, some parts (like /tmp, /run are) on tmpfs.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 08:04 AM   #11
/dev/random
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware 14.1, LFS-current, NetBSD 6.1.3
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 38
I have the OS on SSD and all my games, (DOSbox, WINE, Native, and other emulated systems) on spinning rust.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 02:44 PM   #12
mostlyharmless
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 (multilib) with kernel 3.15.5
Posts: 1,548
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 177Reputation: 177
Two weeks ago I would have said HDD, but alas my relatively ancient desktop is now computing with the choir invisible, and the modern replacement on its way will have an SSD.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 03:14 PM   #13
nonamedotc
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 343

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by suicidaleggroll View Post
SSDs are incredibly cheap now, compared to just a couple of years ago.
I don't have a desktop. But, aren't laptop SSDs ~$100 for 120 GB or something? At the same time, 1 TB HDD is also the same price. I agree SSDs offer more than just storage capacity ... still ...

Having said that - I am looking to buy one very soon - as soon as I have budgeted for that.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 04:03 PM   #14
suicidaleggroll
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 2,983

Rep: Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045Reputation: 1045
Quote:
Originally Posted by nonamedotc View Post
I don't have a desktop. But, aren't laptop SSDs ~$100 for 120 GB or something? At the same time, 1 TB HDD is also the same price. I agree SSDs offer more than just storage capacity ... still ...

Having said that - I am looking to buy one very soon - as soon as I have budgeted for that.
I'm not saying they're as cheap as a platter drive, far from it, but they're less than 25% of the cost they were just a couple of years ago. To answer your question, yes a good 120GB SSD is somewhere around $90-100, and you can pick up a good 1TB 2.5" SSD for around $500.

Unless you're building an absolutely bottom of the barrel, cheap as possible machine, I see no rational reason to go with an HDD over an SSD for the boot/OS drive. On a laptop it makes a bit more sense since you typically only have the space for one disk and it's an either/or scenario, but on a desktop there's no excuse anymore.
 
Old 10-08-2013, 05:40 PM   #15
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 73
My vote and explanation for it were disclosed in post #7 above, but for those that aren't all that familiar with SSDs, I have a number of them and all are faster than mechanical HDDs, but I recently purchased a couple of Samsung 840 Pro Series SSDs and they are without a doubt the most impressive upgrade I've ever made when it comes to adding easily noticeable speed to my system. These things are very thin, lightweight, and blazingly fast. Highly recommended for any of you that should decide to go the SSD route. I'm thinking now about trying one of their 840 EVO Series SSDs that are a bit less expensive, the warranty period two years shorter, but are advertised to be just about as fast as the 840 Pro Series. You can check out any hardware reviews that you find on the Pro Series or EVO Series for more details.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Installing OS on external hdd w/o changing MBR on Primary hdd KvK Linux - Laptop and Netbook 7 01-26-2012 09:20 AM
Reading Linux Partitions on non-primary HDD whizzo944 Linux - General 6 04-28-2010 04:14 PM
SSD's a reasonable replacement for HDD on a desktop? drmjh Linux - Hardware 10 01-17-2010 05:25 PM
[SOLVED] Using both SSD/HDD for partitioning or is it better to just get external HDD? Switch7 Linux - Hardware 16 10-26-2009 12:23 PM
[RAID1, GRUB] Secondary HDD can't boot up when primary HDD fails Akhran Linux - Newbie 2 05-04-2006 04:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration