LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2012, 12:14 PM   #1
Zssfssz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas!
Distribution: Ubuntu n' Flavors, ReactOS, MINIX3, FreeDOS, Arch
Posts: 339

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Arrow Does RedHat Still Deserve The Title Of 'The Linux'?


Well RedHat is no longer the first link on google for Linux, It is no longer the only commercial entity behind a distro (Canotical also doesn't charge people to use Ubuntu). According to the easy World Domination 201 "RedHad Yanked MP3 Playback and slunked off into the server market" close quote. Also Ubuntu (n' Flavors) is third most used OS in the world, Second on distrowatch, and the only linux distro I have seen trying to make a television version. RedHat has what standing behind it? RPM & LSB? Now I'm not trying to kill RedHat here I'm just trying to show you my side of view, ok!?! So does RedHat reallllly still deserve the title of 'The Linux'?
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:28 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,880
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805
I didn't even know that Red Hat had this title. If there would be such a title as "The Linux" then I would think this title would be deserved by Debian, the distribution that the largest part of the distros out there (including Ubuntu) is build from.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:28 PM   #3
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,824

Rep: Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723Reputation: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zssfssz View Post
Ubuntu (n' Flavors) is third most used OS in the world
By that argument, Windows is best

Of course Red Hat is the best. Why else would I be using CentOS?
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:31 PM   #4
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,658

Rep: Reputation: 883Reputation: 883Reputation: 883Reputation: 883Reputation: 883Reputation: 883Reputation: 883
Red Hat (and Fedora) contributes more code for linux in general than ubuntu does in its dreams. It doesnt matter who has the most users, the majority of the code stil comes from Red Hat.

You dont have to pay to use Red Hat. I would suggest that anyone who doesnt want to pay Red Hat for support should use CentOS, but thats just my opinion. Red Hat also makes money from training and integration services. Canonical also charges people for (offical) support, and training.

In the end, the majority of ubuntu is just repacked debian anyway. If canonical disappeared tomorrow, Red Hat wont care. Niether will Debian. No Debain? Canonical is stuffed for some time. No Red Hat? That would affect ALL the distros more than any other single entity going away.

*edit- I am not a Red Hat or Fedora user, I almost always use Debian. I still think that they diserve a huge amount of respect for the role they play.

Last edited by cascade9; 02-20-2012 at 12:39 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2012, 12:33 PM   #5
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 5,770
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697
Oh please...

Ubuntu does indeed have a large following but I'd say it is more used in personal systems than in corporate environments. It isn't even number 2 in that market - Suse is. RHEL is number one. If you look at applications aimed at corporate Linux environments you'll see most of them are written to run on RHEL and somewhat less on Suse and almost none on Ubuntu. Just because Canonical offers commercial support doesn't mean that they are the big kid on the block or anywhere near it. I do know of some shops that use Ubuntu for things other than personal systems but I'd say they are a minority.

You also forget the Fedora project was started and continues to be supported by RedHat and like RHEL is a derivation of RedHat 9 so you'd have to take Fedora installations into account and I'd say there are quite a few of those around. Fedora is used as a testbed for what ends up in RHEL. Also things such as CentOS, Scientific Linux and OEL (Oracle Enterprise Linux) are derived from RHEL.

I doubt RedHat was ever "The Linux". I've been hearing of Slackware as long as I have RedHat and in the early days I knew folks that tried both and picked the one they wanted. Having said that however, I'll also say that Ubuntu will never be "The Linux" simply because there are so many distros to choose from (including Debian from which Ubuntu and its variants are derived) that you'll never get consensus on any ONE being the best.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:36 PM   #6
johnsfine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Distribution: Centos
Posts: 4,965

Rep: Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073
Did Red Hat have the title "The Linux"?

Some companies think that Sarbanes–Oxley and/or other government rules mean a company should not depend on a major software product (such as an OS) unless they are PAYING a supplier to be responsible for that product.
If you insist on paying someone to be responsible for the Linux OS you use, it ought to be Red Hat. Sure there are other entities you can pay to stand behind their Linux distro, but there don't seem to be benefits to choosing one of those in place of Red Hat.

If you don't want to pay for a Linux server distro, I think Centos is the clear best choice, and obviously it wouldn't exist without Red Hat. So maybe Red Hat deserves to be "The Server Linux". But it is simpler to say "Red Hat" or "Red Hat based distribution".

I've used a lot more Debian based distributions. I think Debian is a better platform when basing a distribution on an existing distribution, as well as being a pretty major distribution on its own. I don't hear a lot of people identifying a distro as "The Linux". If I had heard such a phrase without explanation, I would have been more likely to guess they meant Debian.

I mainly use Mepis (which is based on Debian) and Centos (which is based on Red Hat, but in a much closer sense than Mepis is based on Debian).

Last edited by johnsfine; 02-20-2012 at 12:44 PM.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:38 PM   #7
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,925
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zssfssz
So does RedHat reallllly still deserve the title of 'The Linux'?
False premise? Reference, please.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 12:40 PM   #8
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 14,880
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805Reputation: 3805
Oh, I forgot a reason why Ubuntu can't be "The Linux": If they would be they would have to mention Linux at least once on their website.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 01:52 PM   #9
uhelp
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2011
Location: Germany, Bavaria, Nueremberg area
Distribution: openSUSE, Debian, LFS
Posts: 205

Rep: Reputation: 43
Basically I refuse to play games like "my car is much more better than yours as it is red".
Each distro has it's points.

So everybody can chosse, what one think fits best.

And please do not use counts from distrowatch.
And if you feel you have to, first read about how these counts are done.

There are much more server running SUSE (and don't mix this with openSUSE) as they are sold by Novell.
And they do this business for a long time. They even brought Linux to the IBM 360/390 series.
But all of this installations will hardly be counted.

And this holds true for other distros too.
I just named SUSE as I'm a long time user of openSUSE / SUSE.

And never forget: all these operating systems are GNU/Linux
 
Old 02-20-2012, 03:03 PM   #10
Zssfssz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas!
Distribution: Ubuntu n' Flavors, ReactOS, MINIX3, FreeDOS, Arch
Posts: 339

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Oh, I forgot a reason why Ubuntu can't be "The Linux": If they would be they would have to mention Linux at least once on their website.
The word Linux scares Non-Computer-Geeks away (in >50% of the time).
And they do: The Package Discription For linux-image-generic.
Like I said "I'm not trying to kill RedHat". World Domination 201, Distrowatch Review, etc call RedHat "The Linux". As for people makeing software mainly for RedHat : LSB. Distrowatch was just an extra thing because I felt like I needed a argument...
I could not find out how to get RedHat withought paying the 50$ for one desktop, then again I didn't really need it so I didn't look that hard.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 03:10 PM   #11
snowpine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,862

Rep: Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zssfssz View Post
I could not find out how to get RedHat withought paying the 50$ for one desktop, then again I didn't really need it so I didn't look that hard.
Use CentOS or Scientific Linux.

Or use Red Hat free trial for 30 days.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 03:32 PM   #12
johnsfine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Distribution: Centos
Posts: 4,965

Rep: Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073Reputation: 1073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zssfssz View Post
RedHat ... for one desktop
I don't understand the point of Red Hat for a Desktop. Their focus is on servers.

Fedora can be a very nice desktop distribution, but also can be a bit bleeding edge.

Quote:
then again I didn't really need it
So maybe you also don't know any particular point to desktop Red Hat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine View Post
Or use Red Hat free trial for 30 days.
Bad idea, because of updates. If you want an actual "trial" of Red Hat, to test its suitability for some purpose with the intent of either dumping it or paying for it (depending on how will it does) the 30 day free trial makes sense.
If you just want free Red Hat, the free trial is the wrong place to start.
Free Red Hat Enterprise Server is obviously Centos.
I don't know what a supported Red Hat desktop system contains, so I won't try to guess what a free version of that is.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 03:43 PM   #13
snowpine
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,862

Rep: Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030Reputation: 1030
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsfine View Post
I don't understand the point of Red Hat for a Desktop. Their focus is on servers.

Fedora can be a very nice desktop distribution, but also can be a bit bleeding edge.
That is exactly the "point" of Red Hat for a Desktop: it is less "bleeding edge" than Fedora, with paid long-term support.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsfine View Post
Bad idea, because of updates. If you want an actual "trial" of Red Hat, to test its suitability for some purpose with the intent of either dumping it or paying for it (depending on how will it does) the 30 day free trial makes sense.
If you just want free Red Hat, the free trial is the wrong place to start.
Free Red Hat Enterprise Server is obviously Centos.
You took my quote out of context and did not notice that I recommended CentOS in the previous sentence. Obviously a 30 day free trial is not a permanent solution; I shouldn't have to point that out.
 
Old 02-20-2012, 03:55 PM   #14
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,702
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241Reputation: 1241
I thought Slackware was THE LINUX?
 
Old 02-20-2012, 04:08 PM   #15
Zssfssz
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Las Vegas!
Distribution: Ubuntu n' Flavors, ReactOS, MINIX3, FreeDOS, Arch
Posts: 339

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Slackware is The Oldest Linux, as in it is the longest surviving distro, its even older if you count it's parent: SLS.
Also read this close quote from World Domination 201:
RedHat ripped mp3 playback and slunked off into the server market.
RedHat does have a Desktop Version, but I'm guessing it is still server orented.

Last edited by Zssfssz; 02-20-2012 at 04:11 PM.
 
  


Reply

Tags
redhat


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Terminal xterm Title is too dynamic (title doesn't change manually) ZeroDaHero Slackware 4 11-04-2012 12:16 PM
Japanese title window in RedHat 6 problem hoang1127 Red Hat 3 10-19-2011 12:44 PM
LXer: What You Deserve LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-04-2008 08:20 PM
LXer: Linux Companies That Didn't Deserve to Die LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-27-2007 01:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration