Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Mtk358, Things are a little edgy here today. I am just getting back to using both win xp and ubuntu 9.xxx. Plus a few familyt problems that have been brewing to long. I will get back to you ASAP, but meanwhile it is probably best to let things rest for a day or two.
I did follow catkins directions to get the results and as soon as I get straightened around I will get back to you. Right now I am in windblows trying to get a win xp Blood pressure analyser program to work and it does.
Mtk358, Things are a little edgy here today. I am just getting back to using both win xp and ubuntu 9.xxx. Plus a few familyt problems that have been brewing to long. I will get back to you ASAP, but meanwhile it is probably best to let things rest for a day or two.
I did follow catkins directions to get the results and as soon as I get straightened around I will get back to you. Right now I am in windblows trying to get a win xp Blood pressure analyser program to work and it does.
OK! I just rechecked Catkins instructions and found out using LQ869142 or LQ889142 or LQ809142 with a txt suffix got the same results. They all came back as a directory. HUH! How can that be? That should be impossible. I think that /tmp is a directory and folowing that would be the name of the file. So the LQxxxxxx.txt can't be a directory. But it comes back that way no matter what I put there for the file mame. Methinks I need a drink.
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-====================================-==========================================-============================================
un xf86-video-driver-riva128 <none> (no description available)
Does this make any sense at all? I got it by opening the file in gedit which seemed to easy.
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-====================================-==========================================-============================================
un xf86-video-driver-riva128 <none> (no description available)
Does this make any sense at all? I got it by opening the file in gedit which seemed to easy.
I tried this command both plain and as sudo and got the same results. Invalid operation xf86-video-intel-legacy. Which is what we came up with the last time I tried to get this driver. I remember it now. I just can not get it on this machine.
You made one other mistake which I just corrected automaticaly. You meant video but typed vidoe:>) Anybody makes mistakes.
Again I tried it plain and got a bunch of crap. Then as sudo and got better resiults. It starts out looking good then
can't find the file.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.