Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
i have added new disk to system and doesn't created any partition on that, created filesystem and using it.
Is there any side effects on performance of using disk in this way besides managebility(putting quota if using for home and other stuff).
I only learned this was possible very recently--but have never tried it. It seems the only disadvantage would be simply losing the flexibility of multiple partitions.
I don't know why there would be any performance difference---why not try it?
I've heard that the performance improvements would come if you partition frequently used partitions (like swap and /var/log) in the inner slices of the disk, followed by less used partitions in the outer slices. The seek time will be faster or something.
But really, I'm not sure if its going to be noticeable for desktop users. A quick search might help..
I've heard that the performance improvements would come if you partition frequently used partitions (like swap and /var/log) in the inner slices of the disk, followed by less used partitions in the outer slices. The seek time will be faster or something.
But really, I'm not sure if its going to be noticeable for desktop users. A quick search might help..
I'm not up-to-date on this topic but I know I've read that the recommendations along this line have changed as disk drives have changed. So before anybody bases partitioning on this kind of consideration, it would be a really good idea to do a search for current information. (Unless, of course, you are using an old disk! )
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajnishmishra
i have added new disk to system and doesn't created any partition on that, created filesystem and using it.
Can you provide more details ? Are you directly laying out the filesystem on /dev/sdx ?
Quote:
Is there any side effects on performance of using disk in this way besides managebility(putting quota if using for home and other stuff).
The gain in available space would be quite slight compared to a single partition of the largest size. I do not expect any difference in performance. Your disk won't be bootable and might confuse other OSes when plugged in.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.