LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2008, 01:11 AM   #1
rajnishmishra
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: rishikesh(india)
Distribution: red hat
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 1
Disadvatages of using disk without partitioning?


i have added new disk to system and doesn't created any partition on that, created filesystem and using it.
Is there any side effects on performance of using disk in this way besides managebility(putting quota if using for home and other stuff).

thanks,
rajnish
 
Old 07-10-2008, 06:27 AM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
I only learned this was possible very recently--but have never tried it. It seems the only disadvantage would be simply losing the flexibility of multiple partitions.

I don't know why there would be any performance difference---why not try it?
 
Old 07-10-2008, 07:23 AM   #3
indeliblestamp
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 341
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 40
I've heard that the performance improvements would come if you partition frequently used partitions (like swap and /var/log) in the inner slices of the disk, followed by less used partitions in the outer slices. The seek time will be faster or something.
But really, I'm not sure if its going to be noticeable for desktop users. A quick search might help..
 
Old 07-10-2008, 07:32 AM   #4
Agrouf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: France
Distribution: LFS
Posts: 1,596

Rep: Reputation: 80
fsck will take longer on the whole disk...
 
Old 07-12-2008, 11:30 PM   #5
rajnishmishra
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: rishikesh(india)
Distribution: red hat
Posts: 18

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
thanks people.
so there seems to be no major side effect of using disk as such besides loosing flexibility of partitions.
 
Old 07-13-2008, 09:44 AM   #6
blackhole54
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,896

Rep: Reputation: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungoodboy View Post
I've heard that the performance improvements would come if you partition frequently used partitions (like swap and /var/log) in the inner slices of the disk, followed by less used partitions in the outer slices. The seek time will be faster or something.
But really, I'm not sure if its going to be noticeable for desktop users. A quick search might help..
I'm not up-to-date on this topic but I know I've read that the recommendations along this line have changed as disk drives have changed. So before anybody bases partitioning on this kind of consideration, it would be a really good idea to do a search for current information. (Unless, of course, you are using an old disk! )
 
Old 07-14-2008, 01:37 PM   #7
jlliagre
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Outside Paris
Distribution: Solaris 11.4, Oracle Linux, Mint, Debian/WSL
Posts: 9,789

Rep: Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajnishmishra View Post
i have added new disk to system and doesn't created any partition on that, created filesystem and using it.
Can you provide more details ? Are you directly laying out the filesystem on /dev/sdx ?
Quote:
Is there any side effects on performance of using disk in this way besides managebility(putting quota if using for home and other stuff).
The gain in available space would be quite slight compared to a single partition of the largest size. I do not expect any difference in performance. Your disk won't be bootable and might confuse other OSes when plugged in.
 
Old 07-14-2008, 04:43 PM   #8
jailbait
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 8,336

Rep: Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548Reputation: 548
If you are using swap in a Unix style operating system swap will run much faster as a separate partition than as a file.

------------------
Steve Stites
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help disk partitioning claudiudpb Linux - General 4 06-14-2007 10:19 AM
disk partitioning zapcojake Linux - Hardware 2 01-15-2006 11:46 PM
disk re-partitioning..... yanger Linux - General 2 08-29-2005 11:21 PM
Disk partitioning sveint AIX 6 05-08-2004 04:01 PM
disk partitioning gamenutt Linux - General 1 03-11-2002 04:28 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration