LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-12-2012, 08:14 AM   #1
zilog6502
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Difference in LiveCD install and full install.


After 15 years of professional Linux use I've suddenly discovered I've got a noob question.

Most distributions seem to have a two or three methods of installation. Some of them just copy the LiveCD over to the hard drive (as individual files rather than ISO) and others seem to have a fairly involved installation process.

My question is, does the actual installed distribution function differently on the inside if installed from LiveCD rather than a normal installation CD?

Whenever I set up a new distro I almost always use a standard installation CD because it 'feels' like the OS is better integrated to the hardware and structured properly according to the machine. LiveCDs then feel like a 'photocopy' and I'm not sure if things like configuration occur on every boot up.... maybe it does this on a standard install, and maybe my light-switch-on-off related obsessive compulsive disorder is just growing into new areas
 
Old 10-12-2012, 08:48 AM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729Reputation: 729
general answers only...

No matter what method is used to install, some kind of executable code needs to the read into RAM. This code could install everything from CD/DVD or it could get some or all from the net. The biggest difference in a "Live CD" is that you can run some portion of a distro from the CD prior to installing.

I would not expect the ultimate installed version to be any different---any differences--eg between two install of Arch Linux---should be only based on choices made by the person doing the install.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 11:40 AM   #3
zilog6502
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2010
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
The reason why I expected the installs to be different is this:

A LiveCD presumably contains scripts which will detect hardware and set certain configurations which would also presumably be based on a temporary setup (due to LiveCD's being used on a variety of different systems possibly on each boot).

I assumed a standard setup would have set configuration during install and without scripts being run on every boot the system would be more permanently structured underneath (not sure how but just feels that way) and the system would be more efficient.

I can't remember which one but I distinctly remember a distro that if you installed from LiveCD that it basically just copied the LiveCD files over to the hard drive and operated like a LiveCD rather than a fully installed distro.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 10:05 PM   #4
jefro
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,093

Rep: Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521Reputation: 1521
There are only a very few specialized distro's that might simply copy the files in a live cd to usb deal. Puppy is about the only one I know of but maybe tinycore, maybe some old installs or odd installs of knoppix or dsl. Made for hard drive distro's almost never do it weird like that.

You are way over thinking this for 98% of the rest. An installer like in days of old did have a live environment (and they still exist) It always installed files. In some odd cases it did some tweaks to files based on hardware. Much of that changed so that now an installer installed files as they were designed for any hardware.

It is kind of untrue to say live cd's are different. The same end result will be what you selected while in the environment. One just offers a way to try and install while the other was a very limited live booted OS.

What you may notice is that some live cd's offer both a traditional boot to a simple installer or they have a new gui type. Some distro's have to be configured on the first reboot while some happily allow you to continue on the fresh install by means of chroot and such.

Last edited by jefro; 10-13-2012 at 05:48 PM.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 10:39 PM   #5
Dman58
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: The Danger Zone
Distribution: Slackware, Mint, & random selection for VM
Posts: 219

Rep: Reputation: 27
Wether starting from a full install or a Live CD the machine will function exactly the same as per configuration. With a Live CD the only difference is you have an opportunity to test out the Distro 1st before full installation & the live disc wont run as fast as a full installl on the HDD. Either way the kernel will detect hardware & configure itself to best match your system.

I tend to use Live discs now in order to boot systems with damaged OS's for a temporary solution until the issue is resolved. Thats only 1 of many uses of a Live CD. GIve it a try!

Hope this helps.
 
  


Reply

Tags
installation, livecd


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
remount the install partition during livecd install gluni Linux - Newbie 18 05-26-2011 03:15 AM
cant compile/install the kernel in the LiveCD i686 install tonye Gentoo 9 09-15-2009 06:33 PM
upgrade LiveCD installation to Fed9 full install kk001 Fedora - Installation 1 11-09-2008 03:36 PM
knoppix liveCD install works great, HD install not so good stephanie_k Linux - Newbie 3 05-10-2004 10:41 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration