Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Audacity will do this. For batch jobs, you probably want to look into lame (I'm guessing this can also decode mp3 if it can encode it) and oggenc or some other ogg encoder. mplayer may also be capable of a few tricks.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
It is generally not a good idea to convert from one lossey format to another.
When the oggs were encoded, the encoder "threw away" some information in order to compress the file. If you convert them into mp3, the mp3 encoder will throw away some more information. It is NOT possible to convert from one to the other without losing information.
You can convert ogg - wav - mp3. However, since both ogg and mp3 are lossey, you will NEVER get back the original music file.
Originally posted by IBall It is generally not a good idea to convert from one lossey format to another.
When the oggs were encoded, the encoder "threw away" some information in order to compress the file. If you convert them into mp3, the mp3 encoder will throw away some more information. It is NOT possible to convert from one to the other without losing information.
You can convert ogg - wav - mp3. However, since both ogg and mp3 are lossey, you will NEVER get back the original music file.
I hope this helps
--Ian
I'm guessing he wouldn't be taking this route if he had a choice (he had to wait for an answer on the forum and install and learn to use additional software).
The thing to also note is that ogg is less lossy than mp3 in terms of frequency bands, so converting ogg -> mp3 is theoretically better than mp3 -> ogg.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by Samsara I'm guessing he wouldn't be taking this route if he had a choice (he had to wait for an answer on the forum and install and learn to use additional software).
The thing to also note is that ogg is less lossy than mp3 in terms of frequency bands, so converting ogg -> mp3 is theoretically better than mp3 -> ogg.
Greetz,
Samsara
.
True, but if he does have a choice, he should use it.
For example, if he has the original tracks on CD then he should re-rip and encode straight into mp3. If he has no choice, or doesn't mind reduced quality, then conversion has to be the way to go...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.