LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-28-2006, 02:34 AM   #1
susin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
can commercial product be developed using toolkit whose licensing fall under GPL/LGPL


I am totally confused about the licensing criteria of GNU GPL and GNU LGPL. I want to clarify a few things like:

1. If I want to write an application in LINUX using any one of the available GNU GPL tools should my code also goes under GNU GPL Licensing??

2. What is the basic difference between GNU GPL and LGPL in terms of commercial product development??

3. Can commercial product be developed using toolkits whose licensing falls under GPL ?? Or is it suitable to write a commercial application using toolkits whose licensing falls under LGPL??

4. What I get is that if my product falls under GPL Licensing I have to give the source code to the client along with the product. But for LGPL I am not bound to give the source code. Am I right??

5. Among the tools (QT, GTK+, wxWindows) which in your openion will be te best one to develop a commercial product and why??

Eagerly waiting fo your reply

Thanks,
susin
 
Old 03-28-2006, 03:30 AM   #2
ethics
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Arch - Latest
Posts: 1,522

Rep: Reputation: 45
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html

That's their website.

To be honest if you're going to be developing, marketing and releasing a commercial product i'd shell out for some sort of assistance (starter pack, lawyer, wahtever) To avoid being sued or something later (which happens too much these days).

As i understand it developing your OWN code with tools covered under the GPL is fine, they release their source, but you don't have to. But as soon as you include SOMEONE ELSES GPL code then it becomes necessary to open your source up (i believe people can make money and still be open source).

That's just the impression i got, DO NOT take me word for it
 
Old 03-28-2006, 03:32 AM   #3
jschiwal
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 654Reputation: 654Reputation: 654Reputation: 654Reputation: 654Reputation: 654
One of the products you mentioned, QT, has it's own dual license. If you produce a commercial product you need to license QT with them. Look in the Bison source. Under some circumstances, the code produced by it is covered by the GPL, while under others, this is relaxed and you don't need to. Mysql also has it's own license. You are free to use MySQL yourself, but if you include it in a product that you sell, you may need to license it. I believe that using some libraries, the products produced by them are not covered, but for other libraries, the products would be.

You need to examine each program on it's own to make sure which license applies.
 
Old 03-28-2006, 07:24 AM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
If I am not mistaken:
What comes to you as free must remain free.
If your code does not contain GPL elements (fragments, snippets, whatever) then two things apply:
1. The GPL no longer applies
2. There would be no way of knowing how it was generated, which means that 1 is irrelevant.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GTK Vs QT (GPL vs LGPL) bt_2004_bt Linux - Software 12 07-05-2010 11:57 AM
GPL Licensing issue for PCLINUXOS live cd : corporate environment nitinatindore Linux - Enterprise 7 02-02-2006 10:13 PM
GTK Vs QT (GPL vs LGPL) bt_2004_bt Linux - Newbie 3 03-18-2005 04:31 PM
Diffrence between LGPL and GPL? worldmagic Programming 3 07-01-2004 08:24 AM
GPL, LGPL, other Licences Blaze1st Linux - Newbie 11 01-21-2003 12:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration