Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I looked at my gallery (the picture gallery software) page today (on a remote webhost) and was shocked to see some unknown picture as the highlight (thumbnail) for one of my albums. It appeared to be pixelated, like a small picture that was blown up to the size of the album thumbnail. This picture was not in my gallery. I cleared my browser cache and history and it went back to what it should be. Anybody have any ideas why this happened? Did a picture from a my browser cache have the same file name as the one that was supposed to be there instead?
Kind of a dumb question I know. But if you're like me, you need an answer for everything.
I also did ask on the gallery forums but nobody responded.
I didn't really think anything of it at the time. Just wanted to see the image was just in the cache or on the server as well. Was just looking for any logical explanation of something like this happening.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.