Brain dead linux installers and an external USB drive
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Brain dead linux installers and an external USB drive
I have an external USB drive /dev/sdb with plenty of room on a first partition for a linux distro.
The problem im having is that every distro i have tried so far doesnt seem to have an installer capable of handling this.
I tried debian and kali (debian based) and both refuse to see the USB drive.
I tried arch and it saw /dev/sda as /dev/sdb and /dev/sdb as /dev/sda, so if i got it installed i would have to boot from a dvd or something to fix the fstab even if i got it installed in that condition.
The slackware installer has no problem at all identifying both drives correctly so i know this isnt some sort of technical limitation.
So does anyone know of a linux distro that can see a usb hard drive /dev/sdb other than slackware(which im using currently)?
The current version of AntiX should work just as good or better. Because the installer has been tweaked to not have the problem I posted in that tutorial. MX-14 and AntiX 15 use the same graphical installer so if wanting XFCE instead of a window manager. Install Mx-14 latest snapshot instead.
From reading the link im not sure its the same problem.
Anyway, i'm done trying to do this with a debian based distro, of the ones i have tried, some as recent as this month, they all have the problem and they all have the same installer.
i know for a FACT that Kali installs very very very easy on a usb drive
( use the "dd" method to place the ISO on it )
I dont want to use the dd method, i have gotten corrupted volumes doing that in the past and its a pain to fix, i would also like to be able to have access to the usual customizations that one has in an install from dvd/usb drive to a partition and to be able to boot that install as a partition rather than as a live usb stick session.
EDIT: Also booting a 150g hard drive partition as a usb stick just seems ridiculous to me
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV
and Debian 8 installed EASIER than OpenSUSE and way easier than Arch
I tried arch and it saw /dev/sda as /dev/sdb and /dev/sdb as /dev/sda, so if i got it installed i would have to boot from a dvd or something to fix the fstab even if i got it installed in that condition.
How so ?. You will be in a chroot - "fix" it at the time.
Although it's been a while since I had to re-install Arch, I'd be surprised if it used raw device nodes anyway.
How so ?. You will be in a chroot - "fix" it at the time.
Although it's been a while since I had to re-install Arch, I'd be surprised if it used raw device nodes anyway.
Yeah i thought about just installing it anyway and using partition size to determine which drive was which and later chrooting in to fix lilo and fstab but my fear was that the format and partition utility in the installer would see it differently than the package installer.
When I am too busy (OK, too lazy) to open a box, I use a virtual machine. I boot the vm to the installer iso with no virtual hard drives attached. Then I attach the usb to the vm and finish the install to the usb. It doesn't affect the host.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.