Best platform for High performance engineering computation.
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
View Poll Results: Best OS for HPC applications...
So if you need these, *BSD will NOT work, AFAIK. Anyone know if these have been ported to BSD ? I checked and they seem to not be ported.
Slackware is probably the best option then. If you do use Slackware, make sure to customize it, use a good filesystem, rebuild the kernel, etc.
No indication of renewed support for PathScale compilers has been issued since the Cray acquisition announcement was propagated everywhere last August. The most common (but not so very common) recent version of Open64 is the one from AMD. Common criticisms include lack of support for recent versions of Fortran or C or C++ standards (such as is seen in gnu, Intel, or even Sun compilers), and performance generally lower than PGI, Sun, or Intel.
Intel compilers are supported only for specific linux distros. Making it work on Slack is up to you; similar story for appropriate BSD versions.
Most HPC work is done on Red Hat, CentOS, SuSE,...., for example, those are the distros which are available with Intel(tm) Cluster Ready systems.
We have yet to hear from Larry Ellison about continued support for SunStudio, or any of the HPC initiatives supported by Sun in the past.
CentOS. RPM (and YUM) works. The distro is stable. Security patches are readily available. Pathscale, PGI, Intel and AbSoft compilers work with it.
Slack still lacks as good a package system (and tarballs don't count). *BSD has it place, and if you want Gnu-ish compilers for your HPC, this could be one. If you want Intel or PGI, TotalView, MatLAB, well likely not.
OpenSolaris is fine if you intend to solely use the Oracle compilers. Wait: Does Oracle HAVE compilers?
RHEL often comes with prebuilt/installed HPC systems, as does SuSE. They work. You CAN do HPC with almost any distribution but some are harder than others. I've built 3 systems with Slackware, 4, now with CentOS, and one with SuSE. I've colleagues who won't install anything but SuSE, others with a similar attitude toward CentOS.
But none of the three mentioned are in MY top 3 distros for HPC.