Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey everyone, currently I have an XP box with two sata drives in it. One being my primanry windows boot disk the other disk is doing nothing. I would like to dual this box up with core 5 - what would my best approach be? I am thinking that I should unplug my windows HD and install linux on the other HD with grub - then once the linux box is up and running add the windows hd back and tweek grub. Is this the best way to pull off o dual booting system with the least amount of risk for data loss?
Distribution: multi booting whatever I feel like. Grub rocks!
Posts: 85
Rep:
yes it will. you can plug your linux disk in as master, xp as slave and set both drives to cable select. Edit grub (i think it is menu.lst) to give the option to boot from your other hard drive. This is how saikee told me to do it. I believe he has a web page devoted to this question. His page shows it slightly different than he told me how to, because I had already gone ahead and done some, and it was easier to just set my jumpers to cable select, however his page here helps a lot. http://www.justlinux.com/forum/showt...hreadid=130715
This method places linux entirely on a different disk, with grub on that disk, and leave winxp untouched "like a virgin"
Last edited by darinbolson; 09-26-2006 at 08:15 PM.
You can do it that way. But you have to remember there are more than one way to do things. In short I gave him the way that I have done it several times and know it to work.
Last edited by jstephens84; 09-26-2006 at 11:34 PM.
SATA doesn't have master/slave issues as far as I am aware. I would install grub to the mbr of the first boot hard drive listed in the BIOS. But that is a strategy based on PATA installs and the assumption that the underlying workings of grub do not change depending on whether you have SATA or PATA.
Distribution: multi booting whatever I feel like. Grub rocks!
Posts: 85
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jstephens84
You can do it that way. But you have to remember there are more than one way to do things. In short I gave him the way that I have done it several times and know it to work.
Not saying that your way wont work. But one of the parameters he gave for his dual boot was that he wanted the least amount of risk. And now I am not sure, since I missed the part about it being a SATA drive. I don't know about that.
Last edited by darinbolson; 09-27-2006 at 12:59 PM.
SATA can, by definition, only have 1 drive per port/cable, so there is no concept of master/slave/etc.
nitrohuffer2001, your original suggestion is probably what I'd do (though there are other ways of course...), just lob in a bit of drive mapping in the grub menu.lst.
jstephens84 and Jongi appear to be suggesting that you just install Linux on the second drive and install grub to the mbr of the first (boot) drive. This is also fine, and the easiest solution as it requires no drive juggling. The only snag with that is you won't be able to boot the Linux drive on its own if you ever need to remove the windows drive, which may or may not be an issue. You'd just need to remember to install grub on the second drive if you do ever do need to do that. Personally, I prefer each drive to be bootable by itself, just for the flexibility.
Last edited by soggycornflake; 09-28-2006 at 12:33 PM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.