A little bird told me something about RHEL 6.4 and 7.3
Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When I was younger saying a little bird told you meant that someone had good information from a inside source. I thought that this was a great idiom but I guess no one gets it any more. When I through out the mention of two Redhat distro numbers I thought your would know and tell me how they were alike. I guess I was looking to see what the Redhat guys knew. Let me now spell it out. I know somebody a nameless insider that works with Redhat customer service. The internal reputation of the distro mentioned above are that they hard a lot of issues and bugs and are not favoured.But if you are going to run a distro the one that is know to be better is 7.1. My impression is this is company wide thinking. Add this to your real knowledge you are never going to get a better source.
Results from polygraph needed, to resolve this Thread :D
Quote:
I know somebody, a nameless insider, that works with RedhatLQ customer service. The internal reputation of the distroOP mentioned above are is that they hard(sic)have a lot of issues and bugs and are not favored.
I need the 'nameless insider'`s RH employee badge#, so I can verify this, for my CFNN program on 4/1.
Alternatively, I could use a RHCEcert#. (But I've only budgeted for earning it, sorry.)
Thanks for everyone's prompt attention to this matter, to avoid &| voting below.
Actually, I've heard my RHEL8.4 will contain a single executable. But I need the 'insider' to authenticate this. (I finally got its dpkg to work, via wget, allowing more pkgs that rpm!)
When I was younger saying a little bird told you meant that someone had good information from a inside source. I thought that this was a great idiom but I guess no one gets it any more. When I through out the mention of two Redhat distro numbers I thought your would know and tell me how they were alike. I guess I was looking to see what the Redhat guys knew. Let me now spell it out. I know somebody a nameless insider that works with Redhat customer service. The internal reputation of the distro mentioned above are that they hard a lot of issues and bugs and are not favoured.But if you are going to run a distro the one that is know to be better is 7.1. My impression is this is company wide thinking. Add this to your real knowledge you are never going to get a better source.
I think the main posters on here will know what "a little bird told me" means given that most of us are not in the flush of youth.
The confusion is caused instead by the fact that your post, and this entire thread, offers us absolutely no information that is of any use. This site is supposed to be about helping folk who have problems using Linux, not posting meaningless "hints" that help no-one except to give the OP some inflated vision of themselves as being "in the know".
I agree, and as these are Grade A unsubstantiated rumours (well, not maybe even that), I'm moving the thread to Linux General to live out its life in peace there.
@kudsu: reading your background nfo you would know why at LQ we favour facts over fiction. (That is, unless you're posting in the General forum where about anything goes from say Windows to Wikileaks.)
When I was younger saying a little bird told you meant that someone had good information from a inside source. I thought that this was a great idiom but I guess no one gets it any more. When I through out the mention of two Redhat distro numbers I thought your would know and tell me how they were alike. I guess I was looking to see what the Redhat guys knew. Let me now spell it out. I know somebody a nameless insider that works with Redhat customer service. The internal reputation of the distro mentioned above are that they hard a lot of issues and bugs and are not favoured.But if you are going to run a distro the one that is know to be better is 7.1. My impression is this is company wide thinking. Add this to your real knowledge you are never going to get a better source.
Unnamed source do nothing but qualify your post as bearing no fact nor value. Here at LQ we use facts not speculations, rumors or innuendo when presenting information
Please consider opening the above linked words so you will understand my meanings.
The information in the post is accurate but as you say counts only as rumour. I understand. I love LQ and would try to help instead of hurt.
Back to the post. Why did I make this post in this particular way. I wanted to know if anyone knew about the distros and what the thinking inside the company was now. Nobody replied. You don't know me but I ruthlessly and relentlessly go through a process of figuring out things. Alot like my father.
I have come to the following conclusion. LQ is kinda like the best minor league baseball team. It is fun,entertaining, informative, even social. It is the best linux help site on the Internet by far. Some of the gurus are of major league talent. Even I have read numerous times where a moderator has told people who are running a unlicensed version rhel that they need to get it licensed with Redhat. course
Of course Redhat is the major leagues but much more expensive.
I don't the site volumne but I came away after this whether LQ would ever go to a subscription system and even when.
When someone recommends to subscribe to Red Hat it's to allow that user to get upgrades and keep that system up to date via the Red Hat repositories. Only way to get those packages via Red Hat repository is to have a valid license from Red Hat.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.