LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2003, 04:22 PM   #1
farhan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: xNIX
Posts: 121

Rep: Reputation: 15
a bit confusion between partition type


wts diff btwen linux native or etx2 ..welll i think both r same but coonfusion is does both have the partition id = 83
i mean does linuxnative..ext2 or ext 3 have same ID

problem took place when i was installing the rh 7.3 after installing 7.1
it says that swap already exists .....it was not letting me go forward with out formating the swap partiton..........
i first wanted to make the seprate swap for 7.3 then i planed to use the same swap of 7.1

another q? is wt the other use of the swap other than virtaull memory...swapping..temp caching...kind of temp ram....................io think when i reboot then swap initializes from start its a kind of volatile partition
does the 7.1 and 7.3 have different swap allocation table ....wts the reason 7.3 was insisting me to fromat it under 7.3?????????
 
Old 03-14-2003, 04:36 PM   #2
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,408

Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
Linux native == Ext2 (usually). Ext3 is Ext2 with journalling. And it's the same type.

Swap is not a "normal" filesystem. When you formatted it for 7.3, you still can use it with 7.1. It was the installer that asked you to format the partition. You don't need to, in fact.
 
Old 03-14-2003, 05:05 PM   #3
farhan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: xNIX
Posts: 121

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
but it was not letting me go further with out formating it??y it 7.3wasasking me to format again although it hadbeen formatted at 7.1 instalation??
 
Old 03-15-2003, 01:07 PM   #4
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,408

Rep: Reputation: 108Reputation: 108
There's no risk in formatting swap partition, even if it's already used. Maybe that's why the installer didn't let you go. I don't know. I don't see any reason.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partition type AnRkey Linux - General 5 11-23-2005 08:53 AM
partition type Crazed_Ape Linux - Hardware 2 09-08-2005 02:06 PM
confusion about architecture type. trempel Linux - Newbie 5 04-30-2005 12:18 PM
root (hd 0,0)Filesystem type unknown, partition type 0x7chainloader +1 ece30675 Linux - Distributions 5 07-20-2004 09:04 AM
partition type 69 jayakrishnan Linux - General 1 01-02-2003 08:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration