![]() |
64 bit or 32 bit Ubuntu 10.04 in a multiple boot with windows 64 and 32 bit ?
I have Vista and windows 7 both as 64 bit versions installed on the same hard drive with XP Pro 32 bit on separate partitions. So should I install the 64 bit version of Ubuntu 10.04 on this system to best be able to view and edit, copy and paste, and share folders and files between all 3 of these operating systems ? Is it true that 32 bit systems can not access any folders or files created by or on a 64 bit system, but a 64 bit can handle accessing 32 bit files, right ?
|
Typically, I go 64-bit (especially if you have more than 3GB RAM) because you get some performance increases. The only problem I know of in reading a filesystem from a 64-bit install is that 64-bit allows you to have file sizes that are much greater than 32-bit. For example, maybe you save some high def video that's 10GB. You can't read a file that size on any 32-bit OS.
|
Quote:
|
I doubt you would be able to tell the difference. A newbie with smaller than 4 G ram should stay with 32 bit in my opinion. It may be better supported for drivers and programs.
|
Quote:
Now as we're in 2010 and many things can generate large files, it's probably a good bet that most programs in a distro's repository would be compiled with LFS. But the existing limitation is still around depending on compile time flags. EDIT: Here's just one example from earlier this year of problems with large file support and the maintainers considering disabling it for a 32-bit package in Debian. Here's a list for Debian's upcoming release of bugs still related to large file support. I'm sure other distros still have some problems with large file support on occasion as well. |
OK, you are right with this, but your statement was "can't read a file that size with any 32-bit OS", and that is definitely wrong. However, you corrected your statement and thats OK.
|
Thanks for the information, and I forgot to give system details. This PC is a 3-2009 Intel based store built with 4 GB memory, Intel core 2 duo CPU, and ASUS P5QL Pro motherboard. So mostly programs and drivers are to be 64 bit specific then, but as long as file permissions allow, I can share and edit file with windows, right ? I just ordered the 32 bit new Ubuntu 10.04, so that should work fine, thanks.
|
The 32 bit version should be a good starting point. I can't say if all your devices will work 100% at boot but try it first. We may be able to fix any left over issues.
You can not install a 64 bit driver on a 32 bit OS. There is little to no difference between a 64 bit driver and a 32 bit. One is not faster nor is one better in most cases. They simply work or not. There are very few (fully) 64 bit only programs. Any program that a normal user would want to use would be most likely offered in 32 bit. Is there some issue that you need 64 bit OS? People get goofy on this issue. I don't understand it. There is little for a common user to gain with a 64 bit OS. It may be that programs will evolve in a year to two or three that you may need a 64 bit OS but I don't think so just yet. It may be that you run very specialized programs and you do need 64 bit. I will agree that on some systems and some programs you may realize a slight performance gain. It has more to do with the way the modern compilers were used. They don't need to back date any issues to older systems. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM. |