LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2007, 01:37 PM   #1
Tux-Slack
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 511

Rep: Reputation: 36
2.4 series vs 2.6 series (Kernels)


I'm runing my server on 2.4 series Kernel and heard alot of critics on that. This Kernel is outdated, get 2.6 series, they're way better, less vulnerable etc etc...
Thus I had some people say, good choose 2.4 series, because they're more stable, less vulnerable etc etc..
I've heard good and bad about both of them, but not with exact "problem" if I may call it so. No one actually told me this is whats better here than there, you know, with some hard proof.
So now I'm kind of confused.
I'm not asking you witch kernel would be better for my server. But I want to see some compliments with proof saying, this is better here than there. So that I then may better choose betwen those two.
And if 2.4 is far more stable than 2.6 and security is on a somewat same level then 2.4 it is.
 
Old 06-01-2007, 02:27 PM   #2
raskin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Russia
Distribution: NixOS (http://nixos.org)
Posts: 1,893

Rep: Reputation: 68
2.4 is certainly far more stable in the sense it doesn't change much. With 2.6 you can easily find stories, how needed-to-boot userspace tools failed when new kernel was installed (search Greg K-H Andrew Morton udev), how hard drives on PATA bus got renamed hda-sda-hda, and surely in current active branch new hardware gets supported in the moment when you expect least - leading to device renaming (didn't check if it is easy to find, for example, network driver addition threads).

On the other hand, go to secunia.com and compare number of advisories. Seems that bugs get fixed in 2.4 at good speed, but they are not added so quickly. Features too - but you have good-working setup, as I understand.

PS. I run 2.6-mm kernels. But it is on laptop, and I run rather bleeding edge system anyway.
PPS. No, not really bleeding edge - I always install X.org releases after release, not before.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the difference between an i-series and a p-series machine? subendu Linux - Hardware 1 09-07-2006 09:51 AM
2.6.17 Series Kernels - Guarddog No Worky :( Old_Fogie Slackware 5 07-16-2006 03:54 AM
Framebuffer on 2.6.X Series Kernels Ehuwiko Slackware 3 10-17-2004 12:40 PM
HELP!! AIX and P Series agallant AIX 6 08-22-2004 09:35 PM
LQ series 2.4.19-lq1 safrout Linux - General 2 08-29-2002 09:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration