LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games
User Name
Password
Linux - Games This forum is for all discussion relating to gaming in Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-29-2005, 07:37 PM   #1
computergee
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
CounterStrike:Source W/ Cedega


I installed steam using cedega, then I downloaded CounterStrike: Source using steam. CS starts up, but is really slow and takes a long time to respond, needless to say its unplayable. The game is officially supported by cedega, so I dont understand why it isnt working. I start it from the steam menu. Since I installed it from steam Im not sure where it went, Ill search for it later. Im on Fedora Core 3. How do I set it up so its playable?
 
Old 03-29-2005, 08:50 PM   #2
mebrelith
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Torreón, Coahuila, México
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 342
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
You should really ask this to the mates at Cedega (thats why you pay'em for dont you?).
 
Old 03-30-2005, 12:03 PM   #3
computergee
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 58

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I guess so, but I was thinking there might be some people here who might know about it. When I launch the game out of steam, it loads, but is veeeeeeerrrrrrry slow and unplayable. I go to where the exe is and try to launch it from there, it says gameinfo.txt doesnt exist. Anyone here get cs:s or hl2 working with cedega?
 
Old 03-30-2005, 02:37 PM   #4
cry0x
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Archlinux 0.7
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
I have gotten CS:S to work under cedega as well... but it's also unplayable for me.


I get about 10-20 FPS at 800x600, all details on low. And I have a 6800 GT.


I can play the game in Windows and get 80-100FPS on 1600x1200, all details high, 6xAA/8XAF.


There is something really wrong with this picture.


Open GL games run excellent. I get more FPS on UT2k4 in Linux than I do in Windows. Running Call of Duty through Cedega gives me the same performance as running it in Windows.
 
Old 03-30-2005, 05:13 PM   #5
computergee
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 58

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I got it to work like you did cry0x, but I get like 6fps, Ill let you know if I can find out anything. It is officially supported by cedega, so it should be at least playable.
 
Old 03-31-2005, 05:51 PM   #6
RHLinuxGUY
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.04
Posts: 889
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
Man, before I showed my computer a way out of this world, I was pulling off up to and over 80 fps, in CS:S and HL2. With drops down to 25. Stable around 50fps. My rig was an AMD Athlon XP 2500+, 512megs of 3200 ram (running at 2700 cuz of proc) GeForce 2 GTS 32MB! (I had an FX 5500 256 mb, and I was getting a little more FPS, maybe like 5fps, but it shows that Cedega is processor dependent and not so much so the GPU. Believe, before my account expired at TG, I had a debate about this on the forums.) I was running, and still am, Slackware 10. I think I also tried MDK 10.1, but I don't quite remember. One thing I did was turn off pixal shaders to get my great fps, but with the new release of Cedega, I don't know, since I don't have it.

PS: I used 4.2.1
 
Old 04-01-2005, 12:54 AM   #7
cry0x
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Archlinux 0.7
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by RHLinuxGUY
Man, before I showed my computer a way out of this world, I was pulling off up to and over 80 fps, in CS:S and HL2. With drops down to 25. Stable around 50fps. My rig was an AMD Athlon XP 2500+, 512megs of 3200 ram (running at 2700 cuz of proc) GeForce 2 GTS 32MB! (I had an FX 5500 256 mb, and I was getting a little more FPS, maybe like 5fps, but it shows that Cedega is processor dependent and not so much so the GPU. Believe, before my account expired at TG, I had a debate about this on the forums.) I was running, and still am, Slackware 10. I think I also tried MDK 10.1, but I don't quite remember. One thing I did was turn off pixal shaders to get my great fps, but with the new release of Cedega, I don't know, since I don't have it.

PS: I used 4.2.1
of course cedega is more CPU dependent... it has to run all these extra instructions through the CPU to even get it to work, much less play well.


Also, Cedega doesn't support DX9. If it did, FPS would be much better, and so would the graphics.
 
Old 04-01-2005, 02:40 PM   #8
computergee
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 58

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I got it to work at around 16fps by giving it more video ram to work with, cedega had it set to 32 mb. If it is more cpu dependant, would running it on a lighter desktop increase your fps, because it uses less cpu power? What is a good light alternative to KDE and Gnome?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cedega steam counter strike source with FGLRX linuxmandrake Fedora 2 09-14-2005 07:34 PM
Should I go with Nvidia ? CounterStrike Source gets only 15 fps ! TheHushedCaskeT Linux - Games 21 06-17-2005 11:37 AM
counterstrike unionjak Mandriva 2 11-04-2004 01:41 PM
winex and counterstrike Ashy_australia Linux - Games 3 09-15-2004 04:16 PM
Counterstrike 1.6 Kahless Linux - Software 2 01-24-2004 09:30 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software > Linux - Games

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration