To begin I will state this is my first attempt at LFS. I normally run Slackware, but I wanted to try my hand at LFS. I have not spent much time in the forum, but with what little I did spend I did not recognize anyones issue to be the exact same as mine. Below is my error:
checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes
checking limits.h usability... yes
checking limits.h presence... no
configure: WARNING: limits.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!
configure: WARNING: limits.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
checking for limits.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking sys/time.h usability... yes
checking sys/time.h presence... no
configure: WARNING: sys/time.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor!
configure: WARNING: sys/time.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking for creal in -lm... yes
checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... yes
checking for MPFR... no
configure: error: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI.
make: *** [configure-mpc] Error 1
make: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Does this looks familiar to anyone? I am currently running Slackware 13.37 and here is the results of my version-check.sh:
bash-4.1# bash version-check.sh
bash, version 4.1.10(2)-release
/bin/sh -> /bin/bash
Binutils: (Linux/GNU Binutils) 126.96.36.199.6.20110118
bison (GNU Bison) 2.4.3
/usr/bin/yacc -> /usr/bin/yacc
bzip2, Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
diff (GNU diffutils) 3.0
find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2
GNU Awk 3.1.8
/usr/bin/awk -> /bin/gawk-3.1.8
gcc (GCC) 4.5.2
GNU C Library stable release version 2.13
grep (GNU grep) 2.7
Linux version 188.8.131.52-smp (root@midas) (gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC) ) #2 SMP Sat Apr 9 23:39:07 CDT 2011
m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16
GNU Make 3.82
GNU sed version 4.2.1
tar (GNU tar) 1.26
Texinfo: makeinfo (GNU texinfo) 4.13
xz (XZ Utils) 5.0.2
Is this bad? I did notice a lot of newer versions in my results than the book listed, but did not feel it should be a problem. Any opinions/help is welcome.