LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Linux From Scratch
User Name
Password
Linux From Scratch This Forum is for the discussion of LFS.
LFS is a project that provides you with the steps necessary to build your own custom Linux system.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2006, 08:18 AM   #1
adityakrishnan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 0
Exclamation A good Distro for starting with LFS??



Hello all,

I want ppl to suggest a good distro to start LFS on. I've done it with LFS Live CD. It was a disaster. Soo many issues that I lost track of the core construct.

To make matters easy I am considering the following distro's and have numbered them on preference basis.

1. Fedora Core 5
2. Slackware 10.0
3. Debian Sarge(Running the 2.4.x kernel)
4. Slackware 10.2(Am yet to download it)

Are these good choices.....?

Another bit of information. I will be doing it on a virtual machine, VMware(version 4.5). I am not using any Linux OS as a stand alone system. Is it a good choice.....?

Advies are most welcome. Thank you for reading ths thread.

Later
MK
 
Old 08-05-2006, 08:08 PM   #2
Daws
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian, Linux From Scratch
Posts: 416
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 32
2,3 and 4 are all good choices... but FC5 is not great. From what i hear there is something wrong with the compiler (probably unusual customisations) in FC 4&5 and you can end up with a botched LFS. In Debian and Slackware gcc is near vanilla so you wont run into any problems there.

As for the VMware thing, it is rare but not unheard to do this. Unfortunately, whenever I hear about it, it's always a very frustrated person seeing strange errors that seem to disappear by not doing it on a virtual machine. There's also the fact that it could increase build times considerably.

Best of Luck
 
Old 08-05-2006, 09:19 PM   #3
Lenard Spencer
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Florida
Distribution: Slackware, Linux from Scratch
Posts: 177

Rep: Reputation: 20
I did mine with Slackware 10.2, and the only issue I had was that reccurring case of "fat fingers syndrome". Had to restart chapter 5 once because of a misstep with gcc pass 2, then after I got chapter 5 done right I archived the /tools and lfs folders (complete with intermediate builds), which came in handy because I made another mystype installing Ncurses in chapter 6 (take a look and you'll see why). Once I got it up and running I was able to boot into it to install the BLFS packages I wanted. In fact I'm on it right now, XFree86 running KDE running Firefox.

I'm starting right now on installing Cross-Linux-from-Scratch on my AMD64 box, and again I'm using Slack as the host, for me it's just easier.

(I've actually never seen Debian yet, but eventually I HAVE to take if for a test drive.)
 
Old 08-05-2006, 09:21 PM   #4
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,248

Rep: Reputation: 46
Slackware good, but the vmware idea bad.
 
Old 08-06-2006, 06:31 AM   #5
adityakrishnan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 15

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Boot loader choices..



Hello ppl,

Ok so Slackware it is. As a stand alone system i.e. I am not using VMware. But if i am not wrong, Slackie uses Lilo. So how can I dual boot WinXp and Slackie.......Boot Disk??


If you can, plz do clarify.

Thank you so much for all the suggestions.

 
Old 08-06-2006, 08:51 AM   #6
druuna
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,532
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374Reputation: 2374
Hi,

Slackware can be used as a LFS base but........

As stated in the LFS Host System Requirements you need a 2.6.x kernel. Slackware 10.2 comes with a 2.4 kernel (2.6 is test/optional).

Once you updated Slackware to meet all the requirements it can be used (and works nicely, personal experience) as LFS base.

I do find it strange that you had (many) problems using the LFS liveCD. I never had any problems using it (all other bases I used had some problems).

I don't know if you want to keep the base after you installed LFS. If not: Why install and update a distro for the soul purpose of removing it again after installing LFS?

Using a liveCD has another plus: No need to set up lilo/grub beforehand.

Like I stated before: Personally I like the LFS liveCD as base, if that isn't possible I use the knoppix live CD.

Hope this helps.
 
Old 08-06-2006, 10:11 PM   #7
debiant
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: Source Mage 0.9.6
Posts: 196

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by druuna
Hi,

Slackware can be used as a LFS base but........

As stated in the LFS Host System Requirements you need a 2.6.x kernel. Slackware 10.2 comes with a 2.4 kernel (2.6 is test/optional).

Once you updated Slackware to meet all the requirements it can be used (and works nicely, personal experience) as LFS base.

I do find it strange that you had (many) problems using the LFS liveCD. I never had any problems using it (all other bases I used had some problems).

I don't know if you want to keep the base after you installed LFS. If not: Why install and update a distro for the soul purpose of removing it again after installing LFS?

Using a liveCD has another plus: No need to set up lilo/grub beforehand.

Like I stated before: Personally I like the LFS liveCD as base, if that isn't possible I use the knoppix live CD.

Hope this helps.

I was thinking the same thing. It seems to me to be the most static environment in which to build a LFS system
 
Old 08-09-2006, 05:15 AM   #8
midiox
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Rezekne, Latvia
Distribution: LFS
Posts: 31

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hm. I did not have any troubles with LFS LiveCD using XFCE - nice and easy to beginner. Maybe it depends on the PC, maybe LiveCD has some hardware compatibility problems? The only problem I have noticed is with XFCE - sometimes it closes some windows unexpectedly or hides the taskbar.
About VMWARE - it is realllly sloooow. But it has that snapshot feature - I can always go back if I feel that have messed something (I take snapshots at the most important moments - glbc, gcc, binutils).
Somehow I think that Live CD is a bit more adapted to LFS building than any other distro. If you choose another distro you have to ensure it has everything LFS needs. And that could meen a bit trouble - for example if you get to chapter 6.xx and suddenly it turns out that something in /tools is not compiled correctly because of the host system - THAT is what I call TROUBLE.
But of course if someone has built LFS smoothly on some distro and got LFS working flawlessly - then it may be a good choice, especially if you can customize the host to fit your needs, to have all the tools you are used to. LiveCD has the problem of customizing although there are some hints on LFS homepage HINTS section how to customize LFS LiveCD.
 
Old 08-18-2006, 03:18 AM   #9
PatrickNew
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston, SC, USA
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, RHEL
Posts: 1,148
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 48
I just finished building my LFS off of the live cd, and although I hada few problems, none were caused by the CD. I'm only little better than a complete newbie, but I think that -barring hardware incompatibilities - if you had problems building with the LFS LiveCD, they probably werent caused by the host system. This project is, after all, the sole purpose of the livecd.

Just my 2c.
 
Old 08-25-2006, 04:51 PM   #10
linuxbriel
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Kubuntu/Xubuntu and Sourcemage
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by adityakrishnan

Hello all,

I want ppl to suggest a good distro to start LFS on. I've done it with LFS Live CD. It was a disaster. Soo many issues that I lost track of the core construct.

To make matters easy I am considering the following distro's and have numbered them on preference basis.

1. Fedora Core 5
2. Slackware 10.0
3. Debian Sarge(Running the 2.4.x kernel)
4. Slackware 10.2(Am yet to download it)

Are these good choices.....?

Another bit of information. I will be doing it on a virtual machine, VMware(version 4.5). I am not using any Linux OS as a stand alone system. Is it a good choice.....?

Advies are most welcome. Thank you for reading ths thread.

Later
MK
Personaly, this would be my favorite options, in order of preference:

1) Use the LFS livecd. You allready tried it,... well try again or download an older/newer version. I've used them for some time and they work remarkebly well. The X-window isn't that as fancy as KDE or Gnome, but it gets the job done. Before you burn it, you can edit it and preset the language and keyboerd layout, which can make life al lot easier. I'd say, give it another try.

2) I'd use a distro that pretty much installs itself in a rather standard way. E.G. try the new Freespire (there is one without the proprietary codecs if you hate them) or OpenSuse. They cause you few troubles and they ar stable systems. You chose Fedora 5, I'm not that fond of it. Fedora gave me a lot of problems a year ago. Maybe they are fixed (?) ands you can try it.

3) I'd disadvice Debian. Compiling source in debian, which is a really great distro by the way, gave me nothing but trouble. Only install debian if you're planning on effectively using it, then it makes a wonderful OS

Further on: for compiling I've had good experiances with: (Open)Suse, Freespire, Mepis, Kubuntu 6.06
I've had normal to bad experiances with: Fedora, Debian, Mandrake.

BTW: for the moment, at home I run Gentoo and LFS. At the office I run debian Sarge on my laptop. (all with KDE)
Good luck. I hope my hint were useful.

Last edited by linuxbriel; 08-25-2006 at 04:55 PM.
 
Old 09-03-2006, 02:09 PM   #11
dmick1954
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Distribution: Mandriva 2006
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi,

I am using the live CD as well to build LFS. I tried Crux but the lack of a GUI was causing me problems. I found the hint on the LFS site for being able to power down then restart at different intervals very helpful. I am a trucker so my time is rather broken up. Good Luck!!!
 
Old 10-08-2006, 09:10 AM   #12
jimihieu
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
FC3 is what i used and no single error!
cheers
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good distro to compile LFS on? Vampirite Linux From Scratch 20 08-04-2006 01:49 PM
Starting up first LFS install tomorrow! stynhx9000 Linux From Scratch 3 11-30-2005 12:42 PM
Please clarify... LFS 1.6 from a 1.4 starting point? sundialsvcs Linux From Scratch 6 07-12-2005 04:08 PM
LFS Faq Good info! And have some more ? jbhoo Linux From Scratch 3 05-14-2002 04:00 AM
Re-starting LFS finegan Linux From Scratch 4 02-04-2002 10:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration