Linux - EnterpriseThis forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Recently i'm maintaining a HP ML570 G2 server with dual Xeon 3.0Ghz processor, 4GB RAM, raid 1+0 and raid 5.
Alright, when the server boot up, it shows 4 processors on Xeon 3.0Ghz. I did a preventive maintenance for my client without checking on the real hardware spec. Cuz i'm running some script to gather the hardware informations which i trusted my (eg cat /proc/cpuinfo) thingy on.
It turns out i was fool by the system bootup message. It's actually Dual Xeon 3.0Ghz but my report shows Quad Xeon which i kept arguing with my client.
It's embarrasing but is there anyway, the RHEL ES3 server won't "fool" by the HT thing Intel did to their highend processor??
Is that HT (is it equivalent to Dual Core) really giving double (2 becomes 4 processors) power??
All hypertheading does is make 1 physical processor seem like 2 logical processors. Every OS with HT support views a HT enabled intel chip as two cpus. There's no way around that in the OS as far as i know. Some mobos let you disable HT support in the BIOS, though I have no idea why you would want to do it.
Dual core and HT really only help in multitasking and with multithreaded applications. The two technologies are ideal for servers because servers are almost constantly multitasking. Intel dual core cpus are generally faster than single core CPUs with HT. And AMD dual core cpus generally own the heck out of the intel chips.
HT increases performance about 10-30% in my world. So, it's nice, but not a true doubling (execution threads share processor resources).
As far as Intel vs. AMD, it depends on the app, price range, etc. While we've been bringing in all AMD systems for our replacements, I ended up buying an Intel for one user. The Intel dual core w/HT setup came in cheaper AND faster in the applicable benchmarks than the AMD dual core. Comes down to doing all the research specific to your needs before buying.
Well, it's not that easy... It may be wrong, but it's also right. An HT processor has 2 sets of "processor state", so it really should appear as 2 processors. It just so happens that they share execution units, etc... Compare with Sun's new chip. 8 integer cores, 4 states per core, 1 FPU... 32 states can be maintained/run. 8 at the same time, but due to the wait states inherent on each task (for I/O/whatever), it rotates in the next in that group. Acts very close to 32 processors, but if you count integer cores, it's an 8 processor. Count FPU's or chips and it's just a single processor machine!