LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Enterprise Linux Forums > Linux - Enterprise
User Name
Password
Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2005, 11:00 AM   #1
ceci2
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 40

Rep: Reputation: 15
RPM vs compiling from Source Code


Greetings.

In the next 2wks I will be installing RHL4.0 Enterprise on my new machine.
It will be an stand alone webserver running MySQL, PHP and Apache.
Basically, I want to make the right decisions now to make it easier for myself later, like being able to use YUM for automatic updates....etc.

If I install Apache/PHP/Mysql using tarball, I can get fasster releases update instead of waiting for someone to release an rpm. Not to mentioned the fact you have a little more control and actually see what's happening. BUT I don't think I will be able to run YUM. Installing with RPM-based distro will allow me to use YUM, right?

Based on my little Experience it seems that RPMs lets you unstall programs easily. I could be wrong on this too.

Given the two choices and assuming that you are new to Linux, which one would be more practical?

I know there is a big disagreement about this topic but can you give me some help me out here?

Tks.

-c

Last edited by ceci2; 03-14-2005 at 11:34 AM.
 
Old 03-14-2005, 11:43 AM   #2
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
i think it's a better idea to stick with the updates provided by your distributor... especially if all you're doing is LAMP...

sure, by compiling your own binaries using the application manufacturer's sources you'll be able to have the most bleeding-edge stuff - but that's not necessarily a good thing...

if you paid for the distro, then take advantage of the stability you get by sticking to official updates...

if you didn't pay and don't have access to the official updates, i suggest going for a free distro such as fedora core...

my advice:

use official packages whenever you can... compile your own only when you must...

of course if the machine you are working-on isn't that important and stability isn't an issue then by all means compile everything and tinker all you want!!

;-)

BTW, this is all IMHO...
 
Old 03-14-2005, 12:47 PM   #3
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,165
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426
The RPM database will be entirely unaware of anything you compile from source. This will become a problem if you install something by RPM which conflicts with a non-RPM install. But as win32sux says, if the machine and stability aren't a problem .......
 
Old 03-15-2005, 02:47 PM   #4
jjohnston62
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Minnesota, USA
Distribution: RedHat, Suse
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 15
I'll be the third - stick with the distributor's stuff. Hopefully you didn't buy an enterprise version so you'd always have the latest greatest thing - you bought it because the support cycle is very long, which leads to the best stability.

Plus, by sticking with the RedHat stuff, you're always able to go back to them for support when something isn't working right. You tell them you're compiling all your own stuff, and they're probably going to tell you you're on your own.

Jon J.
 
Old 03-15-2005, 03:58 PM   #5
ceci2
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 40

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thank you for your input. that helps alot. -c
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compiling hplip source code. hscast Linux - Software 4 06-16-2006 07:36 PM
Compiling Kernel and other source code davegermiquet Conectiva 2 01-26-2005 06:01 PM
HELP: newbie compiling source code.... kevingpo Linux - Software 6 12-13-2004 01:16 PM
compiling quake 2 source code hylke Programming 2 11-28-2004 11:02 AM
Problems with compiling source code cav Linux - General 4 02-06-2003 12:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration