Quote:
Originally Posted by chitambira
Finally settled for zenoss to enjoy the best of both worlds (opennms and nagios). Note that you can also use your nagios plugins with zenoss.
|
My experience with Zenoss left a bad taste in my mouth. It's still very immature, buggy, unreliable and I really didn't like how it handled monitoring, configuration and so on overall.
It performed poorly when a catastrophic event occurred, instead of notifying that a whole network is down where you don't need each individual host sending their own notifications as well, each individual host will still send such notifications.
I really hated how it would pick up changes for hosts, how it would scan everything you have to be monitored at set intervals and if you wanted to scan for the changes, it didn't always pick up the changes on the particular host.
I also hate when it scanned, if you had a host running mysql that it monitored before and it wasn't running the next scan to make the updates, it would stop monitoring that process cause it wasn't running at the time of the scan.
It wouldn't pick up new processes to monitor on hosts that clearly were running the process at times, having to perform several scans to get picked up.
The only plus I think it had was a pretty user interface.
Maybe it's matured since last time I used it but OpenNMS is still superior in my opinion. And you can use Nagios plugins and scripts with it as well.