| Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-11-2006, 03:23 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 241
Rep:
|
centos4: updating vs upgrading
Hello?
I have been just applying the released
updates to my CentOS 4 all along and
staying at 4.
However, I came across somewhere that
I should also update/upgrade the core/base.
If I do this, the CentOS 4 will become
CentOS 4.x, where 4.x would be the latest
version at the time of the upgrade.
Now, is this necessary going from 4 to 4.x,
or I should be just fine staying at 4 with
the released updates only?
I notice that going from 4 to 4.x upgrades
the kernel whereas staying at 4 with released
updates only does not actually upgrade the
kernel in CentOS.
Besides this and possibly other application
upgrades, what am I really losing out not
going from 4 to 4.x and just staying at 4?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
05-11-2006, 04:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,711
|
there really is no difference, if you are up to date then you are on 4.3 or whatever the current is.
|
|
|
|
05-11-2006, 09:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 241
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi acid_kewpie,
Thanks for your feedback.
Well, not really. I have been applying with the
released updates only since I installed 4 and my
version has stayed at 4, not 4.x.
I think if one updates/upgrades the core/base,
then the 4 becomes whichever is the current.
So, the question still is whether updating/upgrading
the core/base in addition to the updates is better,
or this does not really matter as long as I keep up
with the regular updates even though I remain at 4.
Last edited by pcandpc; 05-11-2006 at 09:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2006, 02:18 AM
|
#4
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 42,711
|
in what wqay do you remain at 4? i don't really follow that. i would assume that if you do a full "yum upgrade" then youre centos-release rpm would be upgraded, and that would be what defines the release version you are deemed to be running. if you have applied all the updates then you will be on the latest version of centos available, and subversion numbers merely stand to provide a noted landmark in terms of the base installation level.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2006, 10:26 AM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 23
Rep:
|
did you install the redhat-lsb*CentOS.rpm package or whatever is called? That "updates" you to your good version (i think that is the package you need to clear your confusion...)
correct me if i'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2006, 11:58 AM
|
#6
|
|
Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
To upgrade from one version to the next, you need to install the centos-release rpm of the version you wish to upgrade to.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2006, 12:35 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: SoCal
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
I'm just confused as to why you'd want to stay on CentOS 4, and not install the kernel updates. I would install all updates, including the kernel updates. I trust RHEL and CentOS, they haven't burned me yet.
|
|
|
|
05-12-2006, 05:57 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Slack10 & curr. tried numerous
Posts: 189
Rep:
|
Wait a minute folks, we are posting to the enterprise forum where being a day late as long as your not a dollar short is not a big deal. Perhaps if you are upgrading 50 desktops, bleeding edge with some testing is acceptable. However leaving servers a version behind and just patching for security issues makes good sense.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|