| Linux - Enterprise This forum is for all items relating to using Linux in the Enterprise. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
01-02-2005, 07:39 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Jamestown, NC
Distribution: Red Hat , CentOS, Debian, Linspire, Libranet, SuSE, Mepis
Posts: 5
Rep:
|
CentOS as a Replacement for RHEL
I found out recently that CentOS is a GREAT "replacement" for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. CentOS is a project of the cAos Foundation, They take the actual Red Hat source code and compile them and maintain them on their own mirrors. The advantage is that they are completely binary compatible with RHEL (in fact it IS RHEL with the RedHat logos removed!) Also, you can use up2date with CentOS to get updates for security, kernel, application, etc. components without having to pay Red Hat for the service. I have "upgraded" an RHEL 3.0 server to CentOS and it worked perfectly! I have also installed "cold" from the CDs and that went very well! I can highly recommend this distro!
|
|
|
|
01-02-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Yeah, it's a very good distro. I have noticed a lot of hosting companies are now using it instead of the official RHEL.
|
|
|
|
01-02-2005, 09:41 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Jamestown, NC
Distribution: Red Hat , CentOS, Debian, Linspire, Libranet, SuSE, Mepis
Posts: 5
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yeah, I think in many cases it may be like my situation. I paid for a year's worth of Red Hat support back when it was, what... $99.00 per server? Then they raised the cost to over $300.00. I have three web servers... that is a lot of money! So, as their RH support "runs out" I am now moving them to CentOS. I am a very small hosting company, doing mostly non-profits and quite a few "gratis" sites. I just couldn't justify the higher rates! CentOS works for me! I am doing more with Debian too... now that the new network installer is so much better.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|