LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Embedded & Single-board computer (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-embedded-and-single-board-computer-78/)
-   -   meaning of 8/16 bit system (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-embedded-and-single-board-computer-78/meaning-of-8-16-bit-system-832690/)

avee137 09-16-2010 08:23 PM

meaning of 8/16 bit system
 
Hi,
I have this confusion for a long time.What does it mean when we say system is 8 bit or 16 bit in relevance to:
1>addressing
2>data and address bus
3>CPU
4>ALU

Thanks in advance!

salasi 09-17-2010 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by avee137 (Post 4099970)
H.What does it mean when we say system is 8 bit or 16 bit

there are (at least) two potential answers to this:
  • this is the largest number that the marketing department could find a way of arguing for
  • not much

Quote:

Originally Posted by avee137 (Post 4099970)
in relevance to:
1>addressing
2>data and address bus
3>CPU
4>ALU

It could be any of the above. primarily, given that marketing will want to quote a large number, because that is perceived as attractive in most applications, whichever gives the highest number is often quoted.

An exception is in very low power consumption applications; it is sometimes considered, probably without much justification, that 'more bits' directly means 'more current consumption' and that leads to some devices for low current applications not being marketed with a designation of the maximum number of bits.

Also note that some processors are marketed as 8/16 bits. This is not equivalent to 0.5 bits :rolleyes:

michaelk 09-17-2010 06:53 AM

Most like it is referring to 8 bit data bus (ALU) and a 16 bit address bus.

avee137 10-02-2010 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salasi (Post 4100380)
there are (at least) two potential answers to this:
  • this is the largest number that the marketing department could find a way of arguing for
  • not much



It could be any of the above. primarily, given that marketing will want to quote a large number, because that is perceived as attractive in most applications, whichever gives the highest number is often quoted.

An exception is in very low power consumption applications; it is sometimes considered, probably without much justification, that 'more bits' directly means 'more current consumption' and that leads to some devices for low current applications not being marketed with a designation of the maximum number of bits.

Also note that some processors are marketed as 8/16 bits. This is not equivalent to 0.5 bits :rolleyes:

m enlightened!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.