LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2004, 03:54 PM   #1
TuxFreak
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 30
Workstation Distro



Last edited by TuxFreak; 12-10-2004 at 03:41 PM.
 
Old 12-03-2004, 05:27 PM   #2
TuxFreak
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 304

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I see RedHat Personal Workstation or something like that forgot the name, its for $69.... Any comments on that? I also see SuSE 9.1 professional for roughly the same price... Are either better than FC3? I see Suse 9.1 has an older version of GNOME and KDE and I think kernel... which means I would have to download updates and install them and I just havent been able to find a lot of Information about Red Hat Personal Workstation....
 
Old 12-04-2004, 01:23 PM   #3
RobertP
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 453

Rep: Reputation: 32
uptodate/outofdate are two ends of the swinging pendulum, unstable/stable. Newer hardware/software means newer bugs. On a production machine like you describe, I recommend using a 2.4.x kernel and 32bit Debian/stable. That will keep ticking like a Swiss watch. If your software product is not 64bit dependent, this should work well. If you need cutting edge, expect to stay close to your update button.
 
Old 12-05-2004, 02:38 PM   #4
mlsbraves
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Gulfport, MS
Distribution: Slackware 10.1, Gentoo
Posts: 90

Rep: Reputation: 16
Re: Workstation Distro

Quote:
Originally posted by TuxFreak
Slackware - Kernel 2.4 is implemeted with 2.6 in testing (I like 2.6 over 2.4)
If your looking for the 2.6 core then just install slack with the 2.6 kernel. It says testing but it is perfectly stable, at least for me. Slack 10 comes with the 2.6.4 kernel and if you like you can always recompile to the latest kernel.
Check this link out to find out how to recompile your kernel. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...threadid=49035
Slack 10 comes with alot of programing tools and I as well write my php scripts under it.
If your gonna be programming under this box I suggest you try Bluefish.
Slackware is a great distribution and it was pretty much my first linux OS. I tried mandrake for about a day and ditched it. Tried some live cds, knoppix, knoppix-std(If your into security check it out), and slack. It really isn't as hard as it is put out to be, you just have to manually edit alot of little things to customize it. Like your mouse and wheel. Right after my first install internet, sound, video, was working perfectly. Surprised me. My windows system didnt even do that. Oh and one more thing, Its FREE. For what your using it for I see no need to pay for one of these comercial distros. But thats just my opinion.
 
Old 12-05-2004, 02:45 PM   #5
mlsbraves
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Gulfport, MS
Distribution: Slackware 10.1, Gentoo
Posts: 90

Rep: Reputation: 16
One thing I forgot to mention. Slackware doesn't support 64-bit yet. I will run your chip it will just run at 32-bit. Might be something to change your mind about slack. I don't see anything that would highly benifit from the change with what your using it for but FC3 does support it, if thats what you need.
 
Old 12-05-2004, 02:54 PM   #6
TuxFreak
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 304

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I think FC3 will suit me fine after hours of investigationg... Thanks though I may run Slackware on a different one of my comps
 
Old 12-10-2004, 06:23 AM   #7
TuxFreak
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 304

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Now im back into confusion.... Which distro to use as more and more professional reviews are saying its buggy and not for multimedia and is too much of a testbed... The specs on my system are:

NVIDIA 6600GT
Intel Pentium 4 LGA775
2GB DDR RAM
320GB SATA HARD DRIVES (they worked fine in Fedora)
Tyan server board
600W PSU
802.11g Wifi

I've never had any troubles with Fedora but they all say its too much of a testing ground and such and isnt good for multimedia. Personally ive never used any media players or anything with Fedoa so im not sure.... BTW is Linspire any good? WHat used to be Lindows.. Last time I checked it out it looked totally n00b but that was a great while ago
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
using RH ES v4 for workstation rip Red Hat 4 10-17-2005 09:20 AM
What distro is suitable for an office workstation ? Pulsezy1982 Linux - Distributions 3 11-18-2003 02:34 AM
Workstation Distro Shak Linux - Distributions 2 06-26-2002 12:12 PM
POLL - Favorite Distro for workstation entertainment machine. bkeating Linux - Distributions 8 05-22-2002 11:30 AM
Workstation Distro vcheah Linux - Distributions 5 04-14-2002 08:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration