Why do people get "tagged" by the distro that they use...?
Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Why do people get "tagged" by the distro that they use...?
Being rather ecletic relating to "the best distro" to do a job... used several already, from RHEL/Fedoras to Suses, Ubuntus/Debians, and now Slackware... I never understood something...
Why ppl get tagged because of using Distro X, and not Distro Y.... ?
For instance, among ppl that knows I use Slackware, I am "deemed" as an arrogant person, by those that do not know me that well... some colleagues of mine that use Ubuntu, are deemed as n00bs, ppl that use FreeBSD are deemed Ultimate Geeks... etc...
To be sure, there are people who will react in some way to: your car, your clothes, your choice of wine----and on and on and on. There are many ways to react, but ignoring them is usually a good option.
I'll tell you why I don't like <<fill in the blank>>, but I won't criticize you for using it.
You make a good point, unfortunately people are programmed to take for granted whatever they see and start to believe in that. We are gullible by default. Unless we probe further, dig a little deeper we can't distinguish between right or wrong. Same with Linux users. They believe in what you tell them. I have seen many ubuntu users who moved to Arch and went back to ubuntu forums and started criticizing ubuntu and filled threads with how Arch is better than ubuntu and how ubuntu is for n00bs. I'm pretty sure these same people when they move to Slackware or gentoo or FreeBSD, will say the same about Arch. So it's really a matter of fanboyism coupled with over-zealous attitude of some over-excited n00bs who just want to prove they are smarter than you for using distro X since it's difficult according to "common belief".
I have started using Linux with slackware. Then I moved to various other distros, but I always had slack installed somewhere even if I didn't use it much, because I was searching for a replacement I guess. The reason is the same, I am a member of many Linux forums and used to hang out in IRCs, slack was criticized by many for having no package manager, which is completely false, no dependency resolution, which despite being true hasn't really effected me much. I moved to Arch,gentoo,ubuntu,SuSE,etc. and came back to using slack. What I learnt was: "An empty vessel makes more noise." This was the case with more than half the so called "advanced linux users" of "power distros". While I respect other people's opinion, half of them are too blinded by their faith in whatever distro they use. No distro is perfect imo. Even Slack has flaws [here flaws mean as observed by a non-slacker] but we slacker love it, because we know, I am the boss of my system and not the other way round. I can control and configure it inside out and it will still work. As long as you know what you're doing , you're good t go. The funny thing about slack is that, nowhere you will find it's written "Slackware is for advanced users" but you will find this signature in many distros' homepage. If slackware is for n00bs, so be it. As long as I can use slackware, that's all that matters. If it's for geeks, oh well, can't complain.
I think that in nowadays culture, the "end consumer's" culture, ppl are just not ready to assume control of stuff...
-Freedom is not user friendly, because it means being free to decide, and therefore, being requested use Wisdom, and Power means Responsability.
Those two belong to the "Doer/Maker culture"
Ppl just got the bad habit of taking everything for granted :
The quality of the air they breathe, the purity of the water they drink, the reliability of the OS they use, or the car they drive, the quality of the Politicians that rule their Government...
ppl just do not care, and do not want to Know... is is just "uncool"...
...And then, when "S**t happens", ppl just complain about stuff that do not function as expected, instead of just getting to the point of why does it happen, and what can be done to make it be otherwise...
What else would explain that ppl keep paying for using Windows that is shipped in most of the PCs sold worldwide...?
Just see what is happening in the Coppenhagen summit... Shameful...
...Freedom and Power are Dangerous Stuff, are "Politically Incorrect"...