LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2011, 01:55 PM   #1
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Which distro works well with small (9") screen sizes, and on low CPU power.


I am hoping to in about a months time (I know, a long way off, but I am trying to organize backups, installation USB sticks, etc, and choose the distro) to buy a Renice 30GB SSD with a SandForce controller for my Asus EEE PC 901, which should allow 15MB/s 4k random read, and 40MB/s 4k random write, meaning hopefully a speedy boot up. Also, for what I have, 30 GB plus the slower 4GB disk is enough space, so no issue.

I also got a 2GB RAM chip, so RAM is not that much of an issue, however the CPU is only a Intel Atom N270 - 1.6GHz Hyperthreading.

Due to replacing the SSD, I also have to replace Ubuntu 10.10 on it, and was thinking that with all of the new distros around, which should I choose?

I narrowed this down to:

Mint 11 (Should be okay, I haven't tested it before but won't the Mint Menu be too large? Can it be resized?)
Ubuntu 10.10 (I have experience with this, nice and fast, but getting old?)
Ubuntu 11.04 (Haven't installed yet due to originally having it on my desktop and bluetooth crashing, wifi taking ages to connect)
Ubuntu 11.10 (Should have some improvements, looks good, but might need to many system resources and slow my snappy new SSD right down?)
Fedora 15 (I have it on my desktop and after a short while got Bluetooth fixed, but I find Update Manager likes crashing as does Add/Remove software)
Fedora 16 (I have heard of this in the pipeline, but never tested it. Has anyone had any experience?

Or, if anyone knows of a better distro which would run well, and satisifies these requirements:

Quite easy to set up, I do know about setting things up, but on a netbook it is always nice to have things easy.
Fast to boot up (10.10 get up in about 40-50 seconds, which should be down to about 30-40 seconds with a new SSD)
Has a nice community (One reason I like Ubuntu was the huge community, but I am willing to leave it)
Easy to install things (I can use apt-get and yum, but I find tools like Ubuntu/Mint software centre and Synaptic to be easier)
Easy to configure hardware (I once tried the Fedora 15 live CD and found that it detected bluetooth, allowed me to turn it on in the menu yet not in the settings, or search for devices. I managed to fix this on my desktop though)
Easy to install (I can live with hard, but easier is well.... easier.)

Thanks, and I know I have opinions about the distros, but please do not start a flame war, I just want people opinions.

Note: The desktop system I tested it on was a HP Compaq dc7700 slimline with these specs:

1.5GB RAM
80GB ssslllooowww hard disk
Dual Core 3.4GHz processor
Belkin USB WiFi adaptor (I can get the full device id if needed, however it is quite hard to get to.)
Belkin USB Bluetooth adaptor (Same as before, a quick search on amazon should find this, it is about half a centimetre from the USB port and has a curved back.)
 
Old 08-29-2011, 02:40 PM   #2
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,227
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
Hi,

Dont leave your tribe...you dont need to. Ever considered a lighter Ubuntu? Ever considered Lubuntu?

There is CruchBang, it's Debian based. Or, how about the new Knoppix? Just tried it, looks pretty.

Oh, and by the way, try to avoid the slimlines...they can be nasty...

Luck

Thor

Last edited by Thor_2.0; 08-29-2011 at 02:42 PM.
 
Old 08-29-2011, 03:04 PM   #3
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
A light distro is not really needed, it runs full on Unity very well, and should be better with a new SSD. I might try Ubuntu 11.10, as 11.04 was still quite buggy for me. I might wait for a few replies and opinions just to see.
 
Old 08-29-2011, 03:07 PM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,649
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095Reputation: 4095
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatPerson View Post
A light distro is not really needed, it runs full on Unity very well, and should be better with a new SSD. I might try Ubuntu 11.10, as 11.04 was still quite buggy for me. I might wait for a few replies and opinions just to see.
Keep in mind the 11.10 is still a beta and therefore will be buggy.
 
Old 08-29-2011, 03:10 PM   #5
3xp10r3r|X13
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Germany
Distribution: Fedora 16 (32-bit)
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hey ThatPerson,
here comes my personal opinion (I will just talk about the distributions, you've narrowed it down to...well I will try) :

Let's start with Ubuntu. In my opinion Ubuntu is a great OS. It comes with Unity, but if you don't like that, you can just switch to whatever desktop environment you prefer. It offers easy handling for linux beginners and doesn't limit the fun for advanced users (although it is sort of marked as a beginners distribution). There is a special netbook version for it as well. Specially the set up is very easy on Ubuntu. It guides you through everything step by step. - I really liked Ubuntu, but the Unity flavour is somehow distracting me.

Ubuntu 10.04 still uses gnome and is long term supportet, which means, that you don't have to worry about Unity and that you've got a long term supported great OS.

Mint: Well...I haven't really tried it out yet. (It uses KDE, which might be a bit too heavy for a netbook)

Fedora: I am currently using it and I think that it is pretty awesome. The gnome 3 design looks nice, you get every peace oft software you need and it doesn't limit you in any way. It is basically Red Hat Enterprise for free. (The red hat enterprise guys are developing it) Fedora is very comunity based. So the developers pay attention to the feedback of the users. As mentioned, I'm using it and I can't understand, why your software tools aren't working. However, it is great for desktop pcs and laptops, but I doubt that it runs that great on a 9" netbook...

Further sugggestions: There is slackware, which eats up next to no resources. I had slight difficulties to handle it, when I was used to Ubuntu. You have to do everything using the terminal. This means, that you are building your own system from the bottom to the top, which has a certain beauty. - difficult to handle, but great

Debian is another suggestion. Ubuntu is based on Debian. So you're getting a great software support. It is...a tank. (very, very stable - so is slackware)

Slackware and Debian are considered to be more difficult distributions (You get used to them pretty quickly though)

Knoppix (already mentioned) is very light, but in my opinion nothing which can somehow entertain you for a while.


The result and my recommendation: Go for Debian or the netbook version of Ubuntu

PS: If I got something wrong, concerning the descriptions of various distributions, plrase feel free to correct me

Last edited by 3xp10r3r|X13; 08-29-2011 at 03:17 PM.
 
Old 08-29-2011, 03:14 PM   #6
3xp10r3r|X13
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Germany
Distribution: Fedora 16 (32-bit)
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatPerson View Post
A light distro is not really needed, it runs full on Unity very well, and should be better with a new SSD. I might try Ubuntu 11.10, as 11.04 was still quite buggy for me. I might wait for a few replies and opinions just to see.
Right, I missed that quote...

Just go for Fedora 15 or Ubuntu 10.04
 
Old 08-30-2011, 05:39 AM   #7
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
From what you have all said, I will probably go with Ubuntu 11.10 when it comes out, as I use my netbook alot and if I were to put Fedora on I would have to get used to it quickly.
 
Old 08-30-2011, 10:20 AM   #8
3xp10r3r|X13
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Germany
Distribution: Fedora 16 (32-bit)
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
have fun
 
Old 08-31-2011, 04:18 AM   #9
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
Part of why ubuntu is slowing down in booting speed is that is keeps getting bigger- more packages, more loading, slower boot.

To get a faster boot, try using a distro (or version) which has lesss stuff installed. Since Gnome 2.X is going away, you might as well change desktop now. I suggest Xfce- its lighter than gnome 2.X, and its easy for someone to move from gnome to xfce and feel at home pretty quickly. You could try Lxde, but IMO its not enough 'lighter' than Xfce to be bothered with.

I'd go for a debian Xfce, or a minimal install of ubuntu + Xfce4 (NOT 'xubuntu-desktop').

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3xp10r3r|X13 View Post
Hey ThatPerson,
here comes my personal opinion (I will just talk about the distributions, you've narrowed it down to...well I will try) :

Let's start with Ubuntu. In my opinion Ubuntu is a great OS. It comes with Unity, but if you don't like that, you can just switch to whatever desktop environment you prefer. It offers easy handling for linux beginners and doesn't limit the fun for advanced users (although it is sort of marked as a beginners distribution). There is a special netbook version for it as well. Specially the set up is very easy on Ubuntu. It guides you through everything step by step. - I really liked Ubuntu, but the Unity flavour is somehow distracting me.

Ubuntu 10.04 still uses gnome and is long term supportet, which means, that you don't have to worry about Unity and that you've got a long term supported great OS.

Mint: Well...I haven't really tried it out yet. (It uses KDE, which might be a bit too heavy for a netbook)
Ubuntu 'netbook remix' (UNR, 8.04 up to 9.10) turned into Ubuntu 'netbook edition' (UNE) for 10.04 and 10.10. With unity becoming the defualt desktop for 11.04, the 'netbook' versions were dropped.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Netbook_Edition

Mint is avaible with more than just KDE. Mint has got more confusing with the new 'debian edition' versions, which is based on debian and uses debian repos, not ubuntu.

http://www.linuxmint.com/index.php

As far as the ubuntu based versions go, the newest mint release is 'Linux Mint 11 Katya' and avaible in Gnome 2.X and Lxde versions.

http://www.linuxmint.com/download.php
 
Old 08-31-2011, 04:40 AM   #10
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
As I have said before, speed is not a massive issue, but I will probably have something like Ubuntu 11.10/11.04 with Unity, and Xfce installed along the side for when I need more speed.
 
Old 08-31-2011, 05:14 AM   #11
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatPerson View Post
As I have said before, speed is not a massive issue, but I will probably have something like Ubuntu 11.10/11.04 with Unity, and Xfce installed along the side for when I need more speed.
Ummm....its not about 'speed of running' (though gnome 2.X will be slower than Xfce4, and gnom2/unity, gnome 3/unity and gnome 3 would be at least as slow as gnome 2.X). I thought that you were after a fast boot?
 
Old 08-31-2011, 03:05 PM   #12
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
It is slightly for boot speed, but the SSD should improve that, I m just looking for an OS which generally performs well, so it will perform better on a faster SSD. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Old 09-01-2011, 04:44 AM   #13
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
You might be suprised at how much better Xfce4 runs compared to unity, and how much better a minimal install runs compared to a full install.

Its not like you have to change distros (though I would, but I'm biased), just get a different *buntu install disc and type a few commands post-install.
 
Old 09-01-2011, 02:48 PM   #14
ThatPerson
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Somewhere in a land far, far, away.
Distribution: Linux Mint 14, OpenSUSE 12.3 RC1
Posts: 223

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I think I will go with either Ubuntu 11.04 or 11.10, my netbook is kind of my main computer and changing to a new OS would create too much hassle.
 
Old 09-03-2011, 10:42 PM   #15
eveningsky339
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Western Maine
Distribution: PCLinuxOS (LXDE)
Posts: 466

Rep: Reputation: 51
Do what's easiest and best for you. If you ever do decide to switch distro's, I recommend Debian, PCLinuxOS, or Fedora. I am using Fedora + GNOME 3 right now and the interface is good for a netbook. Although I never had a problem with the traditional desktop style either. I may actually try KDE when the next Fedora comes out.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Distro recommendation for a low power desktop? justinp526 Linux - Desktop 10 04-04-2011 03:55 PM
Which "power distro" for lots of customizing and good system power management? mothergoose729 Linux - Distributions 11 11-18-2009 10:11 PM
[SOLVED] Choosing a low power CPU MrMcGoo Linux - Hardware 22 07-15-2009 11:13 AM
What ver. Linux server to use on small, low power home computer? vbsouthern Linux - Server 9 05-09-2008 10:30 AM
Small low-power computer for firewall rpz Linux - Hardware 5 12-13-2005 05:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration