LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2004, 08:06 AM   #1
patrik1982
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Gentoo, Ubuntu, FreeBSD
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Which distro to use on a slow computer?


I have an old computer, running windows 95. As I'm in the process of converting into a Linux user, I want to get Linux on this one too.
System spec:

CPU: Intel Pentium 100MHz (not MMX)
RAM: 40MB
HD: 800MB + 200MB (<-- small!!)
Graphics: ATI Mach 64
Sound: Crystal CS4232

Is it possible to run Linux on this one? Which distro do you recommend? It doesn't have to be the newest version...

Last edited by patrik1982; 01-04-2004 at 08:32 AM.
 
Old 01-04-2004, 08:34 AM   #2
carlywarly
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sunny Southport, again.
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 0.93 and 0.92, Vector sometimes
Posts: 825

Rep: Reputation: 30
Vector 4.0 will run fine on your machine - www.vectorlinux.com (3.2 might be even better).
 
Old 01-04-2004, 08:35 AM   #3
afunke
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Curitiba - Brazil
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
You may try Damn Small Linux (DSL), because you may boot it from cdrom and run Linux without installing or modifying anything in your HD, so that you can practice some commands... Later you may install this or another distribution to the HD...

http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/

Of course it will run very slowly if the cdrom is slow (4x or similar speed), so you may want to run it from the HD with the help of a boot floppy disk.

It can be installed to HD (just choose the menu option for that, after you have made backups of all your important windows data...) or just run from a file, INSIDE the windows partition, as if it were another cdrom... (the first option installs some 200MB of uncompressed data to HD, while the second keeps the 50MB compressed file and "uncompresses" it on-the-fly with the help of cloop (and requires CPU cycles to do that...).

To simply run from the compressed (50MB) filesystem from HD (slower than normal HD install, but faster than running from older cdrom drives), do as follows:

1. Create a folder at your windows partitions:
C:\KNOPPIX
2. Put the cdrom in the drive D: and then copy the file KNOPPIX from the folder D:\KNOPPIX to the newly created folder, so that you have:

C:\KNOPPIX\KNOPPIX

(A 50MB file).

It is not required to copy any other files from the cdrom to the harddisk.

3. Create a boot floppy:
Under Windows:
- Put the DSL cdrom in the drive
- Put an empty, DOS formatted 1.44MB floppy disk in the A: drive
- Download the program Rawwrite.exe or Rawwritewin.exe (get it from the internet, it is available under Dosutils folder at FTP directories of linux distributions like, e.g., Mandrake, or other sites). Note the double 'w' (rawwrite.exe, NOT rawrite.exe).
- Use the script in the cdrom (mkfloppy.bat) by copying it and the file boot.img to the same folder as you saved rawwrite.exe or rawwritewin.exe, and running the later program).

4. Remove the cdrom

5. Configure bios to boot from Floppy disk

6. Boot DSL from floppy, and after not finding the CDROM, it will look for the file saved to HD (C:KNOPPIX\KNOPPIX) and run the system from there...

Update: Now I see that you received a reply about Vector Linux - Indeed, I agree that it is also an excellent idea!

Andreas

Last edited by afunke; 01-04-2004 at 09:06 AM.
 
Old 01-04-2004, 04:22 PM   #4
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
I think that Slack may be a good idea for you (but requires installation and careful choosing of packages).
 
Old 01-05-2004, 01:34 AM   #5
elluva
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Belguim, Ostend and Ghent
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 600

Rep: Reputation: 30
indeed, if you run a slim version of slack, it shouldn't be a problem. Though I would consider buying some old 2 or 6 Gig HD, they are really cheap now anyway.
Slack is really fast, so only the HD would be a problem...
 
Old 01-11-2004, 05:32 PM   #6
r_jensen11
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Minnesota, USA
Distribution: Slack 10.0 w/2.4.26
Posts: 1,032

Rep: Reputation: 45
Slack. Don't use anything that requires xf, and you shouldn't have any problems. Heck, even now, you could use slack9.1. What would you use this computer for, though?
 
Old 01-12-2004, 12:00 AM   #7
e1000
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: California
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 582

Rep: Reputation: 30
im gona have to second the notion of vector, Im a die hard slacker, but for this particular situation (similar to what I have run into) vector only takes up 500mb (with X) and is really light on the ram.

you could also mess with the startup scripts and remove any programs youll never use so that youll use less ram.

about X, first off, just go ahead and try it, (dont use gnome or KDE mind you) but if its to slow, you might look into Kdrive, it functions like X only it uses much less ram. but if you can, stick with Xfree; much easier

(PS: I made redhat 9 run on 48 megs of ram with full blown GNOME, granted it was slow as hell cuz it was hitting swap every 2 seconds, but still, i think i proved a point)
 
Old 01-12-2004, 02:37 AM   #8
elluva
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Belguim, Ostend and Ghent
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 600

Rep: Reputation: 30
I feel sorry fo that PC ...
Quote:
Originally posted by e1000
...PS: I made redhat 9 run on 48 megs of ram with full blown GNOME, granted it was slow as hell cuz it was hitting swap every 2 seconds, but still, i think i proved a point...
But I tried it running on a AMD K6 233Mhz 96Mb RAM it it works faster then I imagined. I can't wait to put Slack on it and speed it up a little...
 
Old 01-13-2004, 05:44 PM   #9
rivang
Member
 
Registered: May 2002
Location: Elkview, WV
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 139

Rep: Reputation: 15
Check out Phoenix OS...
http://home.earthlink.net/~gnashley/...ix8_1howto.htm
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Really small distro tireseas Linux - Distributions 4 05-04-2005 08:19 AM
Best small distro blainehilton Linux - General 3 05-22-2004 08:59 PM
small distro..... DavidTempler Linux - Newbie 1 06-04-2003 07:52 AM
Small distro? iceman47 Linux - Distributions 3 12-05-2002 09:47 AM
Small Distro simonkaos Linux - Distributions 8 05-28-2002 12:32 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration