LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2005, 07:59 AM   #1
alamuru420123
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
which distro for p4 HT and SATA?


I've got the following configuration and tried both FC2 and Mandrake 10.1 but both of them are very slow. Can anyone suggest a distro which will work properly but is easy to use and configure? I'm not really a fan of Fedora nor redhat but if they work fine then i won't mind. I need to have the same installation on 5 computers which is why, it should be easy to install and configure.

Intel P4 3.2GHz with HT
Intel(R) 82915G Express Chipset
80 GB SATA Drive
1024MB DDRAM
Sony DVD/CD-RW Combo drive

Thanks.
 
Old 04-17-2005, 08:20 AM   #2
animehair
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: NJ
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15
Try Yoper

Its suppose to be a high performance linux distro. I have used it once and it works as they say (and looks pretty, and is easy to use). Note that there are so many linux distros that it could take a while to fit into the one thats perfect for you but try Yoper. Gentoo is it for me.
 
Old 04-17-2005, 09:12 AM   #3
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,248

Rep: Reputation: 46
Your profile in your post says you're using Slack 10.1. If that's true you already know the answer to this question. Slack will run quick enough on that hardware configuration and is easy to install and configure for someone with experience with Slack.
 
Old 04-17-2005, 09:35 AM   #4
alamuru420123
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I've been using Slack 10.1 for a couple of months now and it's really great. But my personal computer is an amd with nvidia chipset. I could get slack up and running in say, a half hour on mine with X and everything configured (atleast basic). But, right now, i'm supposed to be the admin for 5 computers here with the given specs. I want something that will give me "out of the box" support (atleast X). It's for people who have absolutely no experience with linux. They just need to browse. I'm downloading ubuntu live right now. I'll try Yoper as well. I don't think kernel 2.4 will work with SATA drives. I need something optimised for SATA and HT processors.

Thanks.
 
Old 04-17-2005, 06:23 PM   #5
DAChristen29
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Johnstown, Co
Distribution: Mint (debian edition)
Posts: 541

Rep: Reputation: 30
i would say to try....SEARCHING!!!!! google.com/linux, these forums, linux.org, or distrowatch.com, just SEARCH
 
Old 04-18-2005, 02:07 PM   #6
Nightfrost
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think you should probably compile your own kernel. Personally I know of no distro which has HT-support in the stock kernel. But, if all 5 computers have the same setup then you only need to configure the kernel once. So that's a gonna make your setup rather easy.

There's a trick to make X work out of the box with any distro. Just download Kanotix LiveCD (which is a Knoppix clone, but IMHO much better) run it and save the XF86Config-4 file it generates. Kanotix generates excellent X configurations. If you're using xorg, then you might have to change a thing or two in the config file (most notably the keyboard driver from "keyboard" to "kbd"). And for the recommendation, I would say Archlinux. The distro is very fast and has good precompiled kernels.

Another thing you can do (i.e. if all computers are configured the same hardware-wise), is to install any distro on one computer, make it perfect, and then make a tarball out of it. Then you can just extract it on the other computers and save yourself a bunch of time.
 
Old 04-18-2005, 04:37 PM   #7
alamuru420123
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I think I'll try that NightFrost. If Kanotix is good then I'll use it. But isn't Archlinux a derivative of slackware? Wouldn't it be just as time consuming if not difficult to configure?

About the tarball, I don't think all the computers have the same partitions. But hardware-wise, they're all clones. Could I still make a tarball and use it?
 
Old 04-18-2005, 04:49 PM   #8
Nightfrost
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30
No, Archlinux is a standalone distribution. It's just one I've tried lately and which I think shows alot of potential. It's relatively easy to configure, it's clean, and it runs fast. But if you're more comfortable with Slackware, then stick with that since you can, indeed, make use of the tarballs anyway. Pretty much all you need to do after extracting the tarballs is to edit the /etc/fstab files on all machines. That way you'll have no problems. Oh, and you have to reinstall your bootloader of course. But that's it. here's a gentoo "stage4" howto, that you might find useful....
 
Old 04-18-2005, 04:51 PM   #9
xaos5
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: debian and slackware
Posts: 217

Rep: Reputation: 31
if you are looking for the fastest then gentoo is a good option, only problem Is it would take a long time on 5 different computers, if they are all the same exact computers you could install on one and then copy the drives so you have 5 idential pcs. mandrake, suse, or fedora would be your best bet for that not so computer inclined person can surf the net day to day without asking millions of questions. (I know how you feel) A very last resort and I hate to say this would to be windows if your not going to be using it and don't care enough, as its super simple and any idiot can use it.
 
Old 04-18-2005, 04:59 PM   #10
Nightfrost
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: ArchLinux
Posts: 201

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by xaos5
if you are looking for the fastest then gentoo is a good option
Funny you should mention this; I'm discussing that over here, and frankly I'm not too sure whether gentoo really is (noticeably) faster than archlinux

It's not really harder to set up a linuxbox to use for surfing, than a winbox for the same stuff. All you need in linux is basically a working xorg.conf-file. When that's set you just need to emerge, or apt-get, or pacman, etc., firefox and your set to go. With Windows you'll have to make sure you have a firewall installed, not to mention an antivirus program. Besides from that, you'll need to defrag the HDD every now and then...
 
Old 04-19-2005, 12:09 AM   #11
alamuru420123
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'll try archlinux as well. It's only a question of time. I just can't seem to be finding time to do anything what with exams and assignments. Thanks a lot guys for your help. I'll try these as soon as i can and I'll put up my findings back here.
 
Old 04-20-2005, 01:15 PM   #12
halo14
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Surprise, AZ
Distribution: Debian | CentOS | Arch
Posts: 1,103

Rep: Reputation: 45
ArchLinux is a beautiful thing As for the HT with P4, just as long as you have SMPsupport in the kernel. 2.6 kernels see HT processors as 2 processors... As fot the SATA... I'm not sure, because I don't have any.. I do know that FreeBSD has a lot of SATA support.. and is also very very fast.. But I don't know if it would be what you're looking for in aspect of 'browsing' so maybe Arch would be it for you...

One recommendation:

Use the full CD of Arch, and instal everything from the start.. it will make your life easier. You won't get a GUI logon from the get-go, but if you also have access to #archlinux IRC on FreeNode, we'd be glad to help.

After install do this:
'pacman -Syu'
'pacman -S hwd'
'pacman -S kde' (assuming you want a KDE desktop - will install KDE 3.4)
'echo "exec startkde" > ~/.xinitrc'
'hwd -s'
'cp /etc/X11/xorg.conf.hwd /etc/X11/xorg.conf'
'startx'

That should boot you up to a nice KDE 3.4 desktop. Again.. feel free to ask in #archlinux.. and there's always the forums good luck!
 
Old 04-21-2005, 11:48 AM   #13
alamuru420123
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 29

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanx a lot halo. I'll try it this weekend and post back.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need distro with sis964 sata + RTL8201 Rod Butcher Linux - Hardware 2 07-19-2005 02:56 AM
Need a distro that has SATA down pat corbintechboy Linux - Distributions 7 06-25-2005 07:38 PM
Sata,no devices found,cant install any distro period! dfitzner Linux - Newbie 0 12-16-2004 11:40 AM
any hope for sata on a slackware 9.0 distro? Shasdf9432 Linux - Hardware 5 05-13-2004 04:34 AM
AMD64 Linux distro with sata support dafadau Linux - Distributions 21 03-21-2004 04:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration