LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2010, 10:23 AM   #1
bonixavier
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 320

Rep: Reputation: 69
What makes a distro unique? Package management?


Hello forums!

I have been experimenting with different distros for a while - new to Linux. I have tried a whole lot of distros - my swap is /dev/sda14 and only sda3 is a /home. After all the experimenting, I got fed up with having my hd split into so many partitions and want to choose one to stick with.

For what I could see, what makes a distro different from the others is basically the way it handles packages. It is quite possible to set very similar systems using Debian, Slackware, Arch or Gentoo (the ones I played more with), the difference is how long you're going to take or the convenience of the process.

What am I missing? What else makes a distro different from the others? Please help me understand that a little better and, if you like, you can also share some of your experiences with your favorite distro(s).
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 10-29-2010, 10:49 AM   #2
pljvaldez
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Wheezy (x86)
Posts: 6,094

Rep: Reputation: 281Reputation: 281Reputation: 281
From a standard install standpoint, the biggest differences to the user will be package management and the default package set (default desktop, non-free audio/video codecs and drivers, office tools, email, default browser, etc). For a general user, you're right -- you can monkey around and get any general purpose distro to look and feel a lot like any other general purpose distro.

There are some other subtle differences, like sticking to the Linux Standard Base, or trying to maintain as close a link to the original Unix as possible. There's also community differences such as freeness of packages permitted, quality requirements, visions and missions for the distro, etc.

Now if you have other needs, like security hardening or small footprint distros, then you're getting into specialty areas that the general purpose distros can fit, but there may be better solutions that have been tailored for that applications.

In the end, it's basically all feel. There's no right or wrong answer. Since you've fiddled with them, you might already have a preference.

Just as a data point, I started out with the old Red Hat 9.0 (Shrike) and didn't like it much, so I moved to Mandrake, then Slackware, and finally settled on Debian Woody. The balance of getting your hands dirty, having a few ncurses wizards, and the superior dependency handling of Apt really made a good fit for me. Of course, now most every distro does dependency handling with their package managers, so that isn't as big a deal. Anyway, it just felt right and I've run Debian ever since, mostly stable branch because I'm boring, with the only non-official repository the excellent Debian Multimedia repository.

Last edited by pljvaldez; 10-29-2010 at 10:51 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-29-2010, 10:56 AM   #3
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
You can read a great comparison of "what distinguishes the top 10 distros from each other" here:

http://distrowatch.com/dwres.php?resource=major

Keep in mind that how the actual distro (the software) performs on your hardware today is only part of the equation. You also have to consider:

1. The quality/helpfulness of the user community (forums, IRC, etc.) to assist when you have problems/questions
2. The reputation and long-term viability of the organization behind the distro (I am generally wary of distros created by a single developer or those new on the scene, preferring to use those with a track record of solid releases)
3. How you want to handle updates over time: "rolling release" (Arch, Gentoo), every few months (Ubuntu, Fedora), or every few years (Debian, Red Hat)

You mention Debian, Gentoo, Slackware, and Arch... these are all fine choices, and I can't really decide which is right for you.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-30-2010, 08:11 PM   #4
bonixavier
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 320

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 69
Thank you pljvaldez and snowpine for your input. For some reason, I had totally forgotten the non-general purpose distros and they're really important.

I went ahead and kept Debian Squeeze. I'm loving it.

My mistake was that I left 40GB unassigned and installed Slackware. I'm loving it too! Sweet Jesus! How can I be so torn between these two distros? I'll keep them both going for now until one day when I'm able to pick one of them.

Man, Volkerding and Debian sure do a terrific job! They should make Slackian and end my anguish.
 
Old 10-30-2010, 10:01 PM   #5
mlangdn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,845

Rep: Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452Reputation: 452
You will soon find that one of these will fit your needs better than the other. No matter what, with a bit of tweaking, its still the same under the hood.
 
Old 10-31-2010, 12:45 AM   #6
hilyard
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: Inland PNW
Distribution: Lite | siduction
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 66
I'm with you, bonixavier, regarding Debian- and Slackware- based distros. I use both.

Welcome to Linux! Enjoy the adventure!

P.S Only thing I see missing here regarding your original question is the desktop environments. I prefer xfce and lxde, but IceWM is good and flexible, too. FYI see antiX

Last edited by hilyard; 10-31-2010 at 12:53 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: NixOS: A Distro Focused on Next-Generation Package Management LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-30-2009 11:30 PM
Stable and fast distro with a good package management system Infernox Linux - Distributions 6 12-29-2006 12:01 PM
LXer: Simple Package management with Synaptic Package Manager LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-05-2006 06:33 PM
Opera: what makes it unique? r_jensen11 Linux - Software 4 06-12-2004 10:02 AM
Distro for K6-2, GUI and easy package management sonofdbn Linux - Newbie 3 03-10-2004 06:48 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration